Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Tank Journal

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-14-2014, 09:02 PM
asylumdown's Avatar
asylumdown asylumdown is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,806
asylumdown is on a distinguished road
Default

looking great! If I could do it all again I'd definitely do a closed loop.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-14-2014, 09:11 PM
monza monza is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cowtown
Posts: 679
monza is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asylumdown View Post
looking great! If I could do it all again I'd definitely do a closed loop.
Thanks. Closed loops have always worked for me. I'm also a bit of a freak about not drilling the lower portions of the tank as you can see. Just my personal preference.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-14-2014, 10:58 PM
asylumdown's Avatar
asylumdown asylumdown is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,806
asylumdown is on a distinguished road
Default

Are you going to arrange your rock work in a specific way to encourage a reversible gyre to form?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-14-2014, 11:20 PM
monza monza is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cowtown
Posts: 679
monza is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asylumdown View Post
Are you going to arrange your rock work in a specific way to encourage a reversible gyre to form?
Interesting, now scratching my head on the reversible gyre idea. Currently both the front and back inlets create the same circular motion at opposite times and not reversed. My theory with the positioning of them is that they would lift the detritus 'up' into the water column and then the sump return would blast along the top to help push over the weir. As much as we can direct the flow in our glass boxes when we add rock work it messes with the mojo. I have a plan to position my rock work to aid in flow and get detritus out as much as possible. I can see reversible gyre would create a more chaotic flow (good thing) and hit more dead spots where waste could build up.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-14-2014, 11:29 PM
monza monza is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cowtown
Posts: 679
monza is on a distinguished road
Default

I've never really gone out of my way to ever hide much of my plumping. Maybe I'm just lazy but at the same time it's a aquarium and it's going to have plumping. I'm all for some of the inventive ways people hide it but in my world it seems like a lot of work and a maintenance issue. I'm a simple guy.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-14-2014, 11:59 PM
asylumdown's Avatar
asylumdown asylumdown is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,806
asylumdown is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monza View Post
Interesting, now scratching my head on the reversible gyre idea. Currently both the front and back inlets create the same circular motion at opposite times and not reversed. My theory with the positioning of them is that they would lift the detritus 'up' into the water column and then the sump return would blast along the top to help push over the weir. As much as we can direct the flow in our glass boxes when we add rock work it messes with the mojo. I have a plan to position my rock work to aid in flow and get detritus out as much as possible. I can see reversible gyre would create a more chaotic flow (good thing) and hit more dead spots where waste could build up.
Do you mean the 'gyre' will always flow in the same direction? I've got that problem sort of by accident in my tank because of poor overflow/rockwork placement and it's causing some weird growth patterns on my corals, a bunch of them look like they've been windswept. If you were to have the the front left and back right outlet going, then switch it up to the front right and back left, you should theoretically get a circular gyre that runs counter clockwise for a while, then reverses and flows clockwise for a while. Would come close to approximating a reversing tide. On my next tank I'm going to try for that.

But you're right, rock work makes everything weird. For it to work "perfectly" you'd need like a really tall tower right in the middle for the water to rotate around or something, which might not be to your taste aesthetically. You might be able to fudge it and get something close.

This article has some really cool thoughts on the idea. I only mentioned it because you're plumbing set up and tank shape (no internal overflows to mess things up) would be perfect for it:
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2007/1/aafeature

Last edited by asylumdown; 02-15-2014 at 12:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-15-2014, 12:36 AM
monza monza is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cowtown
Posts: 679
monza is on a distinguished road
Default

There will always be some chaotic flow in mine with the turning off and on and the sump return in the mix. My gyre does not flow clockwise or counter clock wise, it flows like a front loading washing machine.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-15-2014, 03:10 AM
The Grizz's Avatar
The Grizz The Grizz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: 15 min NE of Red Deer
Posts: 5,470
The Grizz will become famous soon enough
Default

Wow nice another 300 gal build, glad to see I'm not the only one that takes a long time to build a big system like this. Nice work on everything thus far.
__________________
Feed the bear goodies, make a new friend, don't feed the bear...............

8' - 165gal Reef
DIY LED's Build
2012 Nano Contest Winner
Febuary 2013 POTM Winner
300 gal + 60 gal Complete DIY Build
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-14-2014, 10:28 PM
straightrazorguy straightrazorguy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 321
straightrazorguy is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to straightrazorguy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asylumdown View Post
looking great! If I could do it all again I'd definitely do a closed loop.
Another dumb question: why is "closed loop" better than the traditional return pump from the sump system?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-14-2014, 10:37 PM
monza monza is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cowtown
Posts: 679
monza is on a distinguished road
Default

Correct two pumps, look back a few to mixing station pictures, you'll see the sump with a PVC line going straight up to the bench, thats a Waveline 12000.

Your closed loop would not be used for sump return, it wouldn't be a closed loop then. A closed loop is generally for flow and circulation in your tank with out having to add power heads or vortex style pumps to your DT. A CLS has no chance of back siphoning, and allows use of a low pressure-High Flow pump to provide increased flow and less power usage.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.