![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() This build makes me wish it was 6 months from now so I could read more of it in one sitting!
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I'll try and speed things up for you! Actually I hope to get a ton done really quick, so stay tuned.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Oh wow I'm slow…
Relaxed hard off the tank build in the summer, then that stretched into recently. Still no fish or anything but I've made progress and water tested tank and sump. I'll post updates soon. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() looking great! If I could do it all again I'd definitely do a closed loop.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Thanks. Closed loops have always worked for me. I'm also a bit of a freak about not drilling the lower portions of the tank as you can see. Just my personal preference.
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Are you going to arrange your rock work in a specific way to encourage a reversible gyre to form?
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Another dumb question: why is "closed loop" better than the traditional return pump from the sump system?
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Correct two pumps, look back a few to mixing station pictures, you'll see the sump with a PVC line going straight up to the bench, thats a Waveline 12000.
Your closed loop would not be used for sump return, it wouldn't be a closed loop then. A closed loop is generally for flow and circulation in your tank with out having to add power heads or vortex style pumps to your DT. A CLS has no chance of back siphoning, and allows use of a low pressure-High Flow pump to provide increased flow and less power usage. |
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
With a closed loop, you'll still get some of back current as the water leaves the nozzle, but since the water being ejected from the nozzle is being siphoned from somewhere else, I think it would be way less severe of an effect. Plus, you can hide the closed loop piping in rock work and it doesn't require you to have ugly powerhead glass acne that spends most of it's life in desperate need of cleaning. |