![]() |
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
The 713 is not too difficult to get a zero reading, so, if that's what you have, it's very plausible considering a decent tank maintenance that you describe. With 736 it's very sensitive and the margin of error at that small a resolution is impossible to get away from, so a zero reading with the 736 is more impressive. I can actually track PO4 fluctuations in my tank using the 736 on an hourly basis ("wow, some fish just took a really large poop.") With any of the Hanna testers, the likelihood of a false positive is larger than a false negative reading. Ie., a fingerprint, air bubble or particulate in the vial will register as a colour change and give you a higher reading than real. With the 736 you have to really avoid shaking as the microbubbles can take longer than 3 minutes to dissipate.
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |