Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-28-2012, 10:03 PM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delphinus View Post
Mine both read zero right now. Sorry Brad
Cool!! How did you manage that? You've been fighting it for years
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-28-2012, 10:14 PM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquattro View Post
Cool!! How did you manage that? You've been fighting it for years
I finally added GFO,it's made a huge difference. I still see the PO4 struggling to come back but I'm changing the GFO out weekly (Brett does the same with his). Just a cup and a bit per week (well below the recommended amounts, but well above the recommended changeout period). The nice thing is that by using the Hanna tester I can tell when the GFO is spent, and that way I know I'm not wasting GFO (stuff's expensive) by changing it out weekly.

I still have the zeo going for now, but I like that I don't need to do it as much. For whatever reason the zeo was not touching PO4 in my tank. I see sort of two possibilities for this:

1) Zeo doesn't do as much for PO4 as we might think, maybe there is a problem of scale (ie., my system is closer to 400g total, but I had great results with zeo alone when the system was more like 120g total), or,

2) NO3 was reading zero for me for a long time, maybe PO4 reduction can only occur at the same time as NO3 reduction (I think it's been theorized that NP pellets work in this manner) so basically NO3 is the limiting variable, once it cannot be reduced any further, no PO4 reduction can occur.

.. just my thoughts anyhow.

PS. I also switched to 50g weekly changes, from 24g weekly changes, and this has also yielded positive results. It was apparent within 2 waterchanges that this was a good move.
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-29-2012, 12:17 AM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Good to hear you're finally winning that battle!
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-29-2012, 03:23 AM
Borderjumper Borderjumper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,747
Borderjumper is on a distinguished road
Default

Did you put the fish back in yet? I'm thinking leaving your tank fish less for had something to do with the zero reading?
__________________
"Rules are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-29-2012, 03:33 AM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Borderjumper View Post
Did you put the fish back in yet? I'm thinking leaving your tank fish less for had something to do with the zero reading?
Half the fish were in, the rest just went in now. But I fed the tank even without fish, as I have a lot of hermits, shrimps, etc...

I've always had low readings though, but I did expect some PO4. I'll test again in a month and see what the full fish load does.
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-29-2012, 03:48 AM
Borderjumper Borderjumper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,747
Borderjumper is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquattro View Post
Half the fish were in, the rest just went in now. But I fed the tank even without fish, as I have a lot of hermits, shrimps, etc...

I've always had low readings though, but I did expect some PO4. I'll test again in a month and see what the full fish load does.
But without those big fish there was no fish poo. Anyways, I'm jealous so I will try to justify my high readings someway!
__________________
"Rules are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-29-2012, 04:15 AM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Borderjumper View Post
But without those big fish there was no fish poo. Anyways, I'm jealous so I will try to justify my high readings someway!
Last time I tested, it was really close to 0 with all my fish. Mostly I'd say the big water changes help a lot.
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.