![]() |
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() As anything but a juvenile I wouldn't think so. Not to sound all tang-policey on ya.
I would use what your wife wants as leverage to get a 6 foot tank =) |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() i hate my 90 truth be told i hate all tanks 24" in height its a pita to reach down to the bottom ideally my tank would be 20" high.a
blue tang would be ok as a juvie but it will quickly out grow a 70 or a 90g.they become rather big fish and need lots of swimming room.if you do get one get one as a babie but it will need to be passed on as it gets bigger ![]()
__________________
........ |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Thanks for the info on the tang, that is what I thought. No room for anything bigger than a 75 or 90 so will Need to pick between the two. If I buy new is perfecto a decent quality tank. Their over flow includes the plumbing or is aqueon better? I like the corner flow better on the perfecto compared to the offset on the aqueon. Thanks for the info.
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Not a huge difference, but I like perfecto cause I have one Haha. If you want tangs but your biggest choice is 90 Do a 6 foot 90 with less rock work. That might suffice for a tang possibly
__________________
I'm not 'fallow' you must be talking about my tank! |
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]() The 75/90 can be considered the same for tangs, both are the same footprint. The extra height won't matter either way. There are a few tangs that you could get away with, just do a bit of research on full adult size and aggression.
__________________
Brad |
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I hate that my 75 gallons is 23" tall...I can hardly reach the bottom so I wish it was longer and less deep. You do need a stronger light after 23", so you would need 400watt of MH instead of 250 watt.
I would not have anything deeper. Longer yes but not deeper. Each time I clean my glass I swear and swear because I hurt my arm trying to reach the very bottom to clean it. Can't use a magnet because the sand might get cought it in. I just wish it was like 2" less deep.
__________________
_________________________ More fish die from human stupidity than any other disease... |
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() My 100 is 22 and I hate getting mysleeves wet lol I think 18-20 high is perfect
__________________
I'm not 'fallow' you must be talking about my tank! |
#18
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() There's no denying you'll get more light to the bottom with 400 vs 250 w but that depends on a few things (some 250w bulbs destroy some 400 in terms of PAR). I'm running 20k 250w bulbs (much less PAR than your average 10 -14k) in a 27" deep tank and have sps growing (colorfully) on the bottom.
Brad's point is still true tho. I'd go with the 75 as well. It's a nicely proportioned tank. Before I went any taller in that tank size class I'd definitely go longer or wider. |
#19
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() really? what type of SPS?
I would not put any SPS at the bottom in mine and I have a Pheonix 14k in 23" deep. I put them there at the begining for acclimatation but to get them in good color they need more light or they will brown out of be dull. So I am wondering what type of SPS you grow "colorfully" at the bottom of a 27" deep tank running low par 20k 250 watt light? Quote:
__________________
_________________________ More fish die from human stupidity than any other disease... |
#20
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Since this is relevant to choosing between the tanks... here is one of several. Tank's 36" wide to boot with halides only down the center:
![]() |