![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Swine Flu/H1N1 Vaccination - yes or No? | |||
Yes, I'll take it. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
86 | 33.99% |
No, I wont take it. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
94 | 37.15% |
I need more information before deciding. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
26 | 10.28% |
I've already had or have H1N1. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 5.93% |
I think it's a conspiracy of some sort so please don't take it! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
32 | 12.65% |
Voters: 253. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() No, No, and No...I don't want it. The last time I was sick was 5 years ago when I got a flu shot, and since then I don't bother. My son is 3 years old, and honestly the only time he has been sick was the night he cut his first two teeth. Other then that time, has has never had a snivle, sneeze, or cough...and yes, we chose to not give him the recomended barrage of vacinations when he was born. We're not hippies, or crazy people...we just take the time to research all of the facts that are now out their due to the internet.
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Several strains of flu do not produce the PB1-F2 protein and this strain of H1N1 does not either. It is not uncommon and it appears to be a good thing. The PB1-F2 protein appears to increase the virulence of the virus and make it more lethal. It was produced by the viruses that caused pandemics in the past so I guess we are lucky this time. This H1N1 could have been more virulent and deadly had it produced that protein. However, here's the thing. H1N1 does carry the gene for PB1-F2 but it is currently switched off. And while not active at the moment the virus could mutate and the gene could become active so a more virulent strain could emerge. This is one of the reasons vaccination is important. The more people vaccinated, the fewer people get infected and the lower the chance that a more virulent mutation can occur and spread. Quote:
The components in the vaccine are as follows: 1. 3.75 micrograms of H1N1 HA protein from the dead virus 2. Squalene. Doing a quick search it looks like the LD50 (the dose that caused 50% of test animals to die) is 1.8 g/Kg(grams per kilogram body weight). The amount of squalene in a dose of vaccine is 10.69 mg or 0.01069 grams. So in an average say 55 kg adult that works out to a dose of 0.00019436 g/Kg which works out to a margin of safety of over 5000:1. So if you gave a bunch of people 5000 vaccine injections to each of those people then about half would die. Of course that is assuming the same LD50 in humans and the LD50 in humans is typically much higher than in mice so the safety margin is likely even higher than that. BTW, that safety margin of 5000:1 is much better then many drugs you take commonly such as tylenol etc. Also, squalene is commonly used by the cosmetic industry in skin moisturizers so you have probably all been exposed to it in the past. 2. 11.86 mg DL-alpha-tocopherol - This is vitamin E. You all like Vitamin E don't you? ![]() 3. 4.86 mg Polysorbate 80. This is an emulsifier that helps keep the squalene (fish oil) mixed in with the water and other components in the vaccine. It is very common in food and cosmetics and considered safe. I think some studies showed that higher doses of Polysorbate 80 may cause infertility in rats that was at much higher doses then you will see in this vaccine (again, probably needing to inject thousands of doses to get to that level) The vaccine also contains a number of excipients which are routine additives that are considered safe such as sodium chloride, the above mentioned thimerosal, potassium phosphate, potassium chloride etc. As for other "undisclosed" biologicals that is not likely. Regulators are very strict about disclosure of what is in your drugs etc. and every ingredient, including water, has to be listed and disclosed. Uou typically have to submit results of independent analysis of your drug to the regulatory bodies. If you want to read about the vaccine check this link: http://www.gsk.ca/english/docs-pdf/A..._CAPA01v01.pdf Quote:
As for any conspiracy to reduce the human population why do we need a bioengineered flu virus or suspicious vaccines? We have war and famine and to do the job and mother nature is also very good at controlling populations with diseases such as this. So come on, let's be real. I discount and ridicule them because they are extremely implausible and unlikely. There is no real evidence to support them. But they make good stories for Dan Brown, Hollywood and the internet ![]() I'm a scientist and I am all for questioning things as that is the scientific method. But it has to be done in a reasonable and systematic way and conclusions have to be arrived at based on facts, and evidence rather then anecdotes and feelings and fear and misunderstanding. Quote:
Anyhow, I need to get back to work now... |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
I'm all about the Zeitgeist! I also follow Project Camelot. Some great interviews there with various whistle blowers, ex-black ops guys etc. Even if you don't believe what they say, it's great entertainment for those interested in conspiracy/Illuminati/2012/UFO's etc. Link to H1N1 Conspiracy Interview Some resources for people wanting more info: BBC News Swine Flu Info & News Page Government of Canada, Public Health Agency Website Official UK Government Swine Flu Information Pages The Flu Case - Jane Burgermeister's investigation into the swine flu vaccine, bird flu and the real reasons for mass vaccinations. ...and finally a website for the Conspiracy Theorists. Whatever you decide, please be safe! . Last edited by VFX; 10-27-2009 at 06:52 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Seeking approval after manufacture,changing dates on vials due to expire Hmmm.
__________________
Sebae |