|
|
|
|
|
#1
02-23-2008, 03:20 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
Personal attack vs Defending an inccurate statement
Chin
I think you are good person and by no means did I intend a personal attack to underworldaquatics. I was just defending a statement that was basically saying I was a liar. Now that is where the personal attack took place. He does say "years ago" and I was saying if it was less than 10 or so then they were probably brought in illegally. And it would be doubtful if any were still alive. I also suggested that it would be worthwhile seeing some of the ones that are in Canada. When I see this, I will stand corrected and full apologies will be given. If people read the Clarion thread on ReefCentral they will see all kinds of information on the illegal collection and importation of this species and others. Illegal collection is just plain wrong and the time frame underwater brought them in suggests his were illegal when compared with the information from Cortez Marine (Steve) who is the person who holds the Mexican passport and legally collected and distributed this recent batch of Clarions. Quote:
__________________
210 Gal Project Image Gallery will track progress. Last edited by PHCorrect; 02-23-2008 at 03:39 PM. Reason: wrong tone |
|
#2
02-23-2008, 04:15 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
debate
The legality on previously imported Clarions would be a great debate and a great debate is set by the tone, content, knowledge and appropriate reference of the material. When a contradiction or disagreement on a debatable topic is produced, request for more information or produce more information to reinforce your side; but a disagreement does not make either side a liar.
Most if not all of us will agree that illegal collection is wrong. Fortunately for the customs officers who enforce these regulations, these cases are very easy to convict on. By simple possession and the prerequisite of declaration of the species (which is often false if illegally collected) makes it very easy to show mens rea (intent) to import illegally caught species. The unfortunate part is the ratio of customs officers to shipments; they just can't physically inspect everything that goes through. If they are required to inspect ALL shipments that go through, we will never get any of our livestock alive. Another factor against the customs officers is knowledge; very little number of them have good knowledge on the different species of fish, birds, reptiles, or mammals by plain visual inspections. I'm not familiar with importation laws but the statute of limitations on summary conviction offences are 6 months and there is no limitations on indictable offences.
__________________
____________ If people don't die, it wouldn't make living important. And why do we fall? So we can learn to pick ourselves up. |
|
#3
02-23-2008, 06:01 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Just curious but what proof are you offering that these are legally caught? I only ask because I know for a FACT that there are more in Canada (Toronto) (Maybe illegally, I have no idea but they were brought up from the US last year) and Im just curious how you would distinguish yours from the two I know live in T.O.
|
|
#4
02-23-2008, 07:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
also I was not trying to call you a liar, but I will point out that your talking alot about something you very obviously dont know alot about. Further based on the life expectancy of Large Angels I would be dissapointed if the ones I imported were not still alive... Heres a scenerio... Mexican exporter ships out 50 legally caught Clarion Angels, 20 get disspursed to 5 large LA wholesalers, 10 to 3 Flordia wholesalers, 10 to 5 Japan wholesalers, and 5 to 3 UK wholesalers, and 5 to 2 Australian wholesalers.So now with some basic math... you can clearly see that I can now leagally import a Clarion Angel from one of 18 places from around the world....And since its a desirable fish... how bout the Clarion that went from Mexico to LA, once in LA it was sent to a networking wholesaler in Flordia, the customer the fish was broght in for got divorced and bailed on his order, so the Clarion was up for sale again and Jim in winnipeg heard about it and ordered it from Flordia....Jim is now admiring his beautiful Clarion Angel that he aquired legally, untill someone starts saying things they know little about, Jim is annoyed! I would be too! Anyways... Ive brought in a few Clarion Angels over the years and they were imported legally. Please have a full understanding of what your talking about before insinuating illegal activity...it ****es people off to say the least.... Cheers! Last edited by UnderWorldAquatics; 02-23-2008 at 07:44 PM. |
|
#6
02-23-2008, 09:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
thanks for being an internet hero! |
|
#7
02-23-2008, 10:13 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
I simply asked PH correct how one would know if they are legal or not. I think you are basically saying that its an insult to ask him for proof but why not? Im honestly not interested in buying them anyways but I am curious since its a big debate about illegal and legal caught fish...So how do you KNOW this is legal? Most LFS do their best to only buy from reputable suppliers but even the wholesalers don't always know whats going on overseas. I have talked the LFS I shop at all the time and they admitted that they thought the Copperbands they receive are cyanide caught even though they are told that is not the case. Your reading into my post WAY too much. The only reason Im curious about this at all is that it was stated that this may be one of two in Canada. My father and stepmother have 2. Honestly I have no idea if they are legal or illegal but I do know my father would not knowingly buy an illegal fish. He does employ a aquarium service company in Toronto that set up his 600G tank and does all the maintenance for him and also bought the fish...so maybe illegally? I have no idea but I was just asking about what would make this one for sale any different from the 2 he has? |
|
#8
02-23-2008, 11:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Sorry again for any confusion GreenSpotPuffer Cheers! |
|
#9
02-23-2008, 11:34 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
 |
|
#10
02-24-2008, 12:00 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
More information on the colection of Clarions
Gentlemen (and ladies),
I really did not intend to start this kind of controversy. Here is a link to the source of my information. http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/sh...readid=1295178 If I am interpreting the knowledge/gossip correctly it seems that there has been a period of time where illegal collection took place. Mexico simply did not issue permits for their collection. It is a very interesting read. I know that the fish I have was collect under a new permit which was recently issued. In fact the person who collected these was asked by USFW to handle the batch Murminator referred to in his earlier post -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gorgeous fish.....wasn't one of these was it? http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...ng/photo2.html These were collected around two years ago apparently and LFS like www.oldtownaquarium.com that either knowingly or unknowingly had to remove them from their tanks. Now if some swam up to Canada then…well you connect the dots. Anyways I am not calling anyone anything and I am not selling this fish any more. It is a great specimen and I watch it grow and enjoy it over the next few years and then maybe sell it to the Asian market for much more. If you take the time to read the thread on Reef Central the collector has the market cornered on this species and is doing everything in his marketing to keep the price high including limiting the collection and shorting the demand. This is probably a good investment.
__________________
210 Gal Project Image Gallery will track progress. |
Hybrid Mode
