Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-11-2008, 01:58 PM
SeaSerpant's Avatar
SeaSerpant SeaSerpant is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 450
SeaSerpant is on a distinguished road
Default

????????? LOL. Well i found a guy thats selling a 60g tank and a 60g sump in my area. I think i'm going to get that. Would that be good for a regal tang or is that still to small?
__________________
><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>
><((((º>`·.¸(((º>¸¸
`·.. ><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-11-2008, 02:04 PM
digital-audiophile's Avatar
digital-audiophile digital-audiophile is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SE Calgary - DouglasGlen
Posts: 1,456
digital-audiophile is on a distinguished road
Default

Regals get big, and poop a lot. I have one in my 90, that I bought as a quarter sized baby, he has grown to over 3" long in just 7 months. If I had the proper space I would go with a bigger tank but I am confined to my 90 at least until I demo and redesign the basement.


For most tangs they say a 90 is really the minimum. It seems that lots of people keep them in smaller tanks, they just don't talk about it for fear of the tang police.
__________________
- Greg

90G : Light - Tek 6xT5 | Skim - EuroReef RS135 | Flow - 2xVortech MP40W | Control - Reef Keeper 2
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-11-2008, 02:05 PM
mark's Avatar
mark mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,212
mark is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaSerpant View Post
????????? LOL. Well i found a guy thats selling a 60g tank and a 60g sump in my area. I think i'm going to get that. Would that be good for a regal tang or is that still to small?
Have you looked at the links from VFX? Believe they were attached for you as they have recommended min tank size.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-11-2008, 03:07 PM
Reefer Rob's Avatar
Reefer Rob Reefer Rob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 997
Reefer Rob is on a distinguished road
Default

I have a Regal Tang in a 180 and it's still too small for it. Not a fish that adapts well to captivity IMO, even though I bought it Toony size (it's now about 7"). I would never get another one.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-11-2008, 03:58 PM
michika's Avatar
michika michika is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: YYC
Posts: 5,063
michika is on a distinguished road
Default

I had one in a 230g and that is probably the smallest tank I would put a larger tang in. They need to swim, so lots of lengthwise space is a must. If you are setting up a much larger system, and have smaller system up then I would tentatively say yes. HOWEVER, the smaller system needs to be decently large to start with, say 90g.
__________________
+.-.+.-.+.-.+.-.+.-.+.-.+
I glue animals to rocks
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-11-2008, 07:31 PM
fishoholic's Avatar
fishoholic fishoholic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 4,137
fishoholic will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michika View Post
I had one in a 230g and that is probably the smallest tank I would put a larger tang in. They need to swim, so lots of lengthwise space is a must. If you are setting up a much larger system, and have smaller system up then I would tentatively say yes. HOWEVER, the smaller system needs to be decently large to start with, say 90g.
I second that. We just upgraded to a 230g because our Regal and Salfin tangs out grew our 120g. They are much happier now in the 230g. However bigger is always better 90g would be the smallest I'd go with for tangs.
__________________
One more fish should be ok?, right!!! - Laurie
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-11-2008, 07:59 PM
Reefer Rob's Avatar
Reefer Rob Reefer Rob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 997
Reefer Rob is on a distinguished road
Default

There are lots of Tangs that do OK in a smaller tank (60 to 90-ish) Any of the "reef cleaning" tangs such as Yellow Tangs happily clean rocks all day seemingly oblivious to their surroundings. It's just that the Regal is a free swimming plankton feeder that likes to roam, they just don't get the living in a box thing.

I can't bring my wife with me when I shop for fish, all those cute little baby Regals at the store have that puppy in the pet store window effect on her.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-12-2008, 01:02 AM
SeaSerpant's Avatar
SeaSerpant SeaSerpant is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 450
SeaSerpant is on a distinguished road
Default

I guess no REGAL tang for me What other kind of tang would go good in a 60g tank.
__________________
><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>
><((((º>`·.¸(((º>¸¸
`·.. ><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-11-2008, 04:14 PM
VFX's Avatar
VFX VFX is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 405
VFX is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaSerpant View Post
????????? LOL. Well i found a guy thats selling a 60g tank and a 60g sump in my area. I think i'm going to get that. Would that be good for a regal tang or is that still to small?
As you may gather from the replies 60g is too small for a Regal!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.