Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Polls

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-04-2006, 02:40 PM
Reefer Rob's Avatar
Reefer Rob Reefer Rob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 997
Reefer Rob is on a distinguished road
Default

If somebody in the Lower Mainland has a light meter and they want to take some measurements, they could measure my lowly 324 watts of T5s I have now, or wait until I set up my 180, it will have about 800 watts of T5 lighting over it. That sounds like more fun
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-04-2006, 09:02 PM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reefer Rob View Post
If somebody in the Lower Mainland has a light meter and they want to take some measurements, they could measure my lowly 324 watts of T5s I have now, or wait until I set up my 180, it will have about 800 watts of T5 lighting over it. That sounds like more fun
Ok when you do this make sure it is a PAR meter not a lux or what ever meter. To bad you wern't on the Island as I do have a PAR meter.

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2006, 03:17 AM
kwirky's Avatar
kwirky kwirky is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,127
kwirky is on a distinguished road
Default

There are a lot of factors to consider for the "best" light.

I think individual applications can be deciding factors for "the best light". Square tanks vs long/narrow tanks, deep tanks, shallow tanks, etc etc.

I think cube tanks are best lit with MH lights. T5's are good IF they're propperly reflected. And a properly cooled fixture (not the sunlight supply fixture) can get almost DOUBLE the output (can't remember the name of that 'better' branded T5 fixture). I'm really contemplating voiding my sunlight supply warranty and carving holes in the top of my 8 bulb fixture for ventilation fans. Heard you get about a 75% increase in output by running the lights cool.

about those solaris lights, I think of them as buying your fixture, AND your next 8 bulbs at the same time. That's something I rather would NOT like to do, since it can be great to experiment with a different bulb combination when you change lights. Sure you can change the colour, but you're just decreasing output with colour changes. The good thing going for the solaris fixture though is the fancy cloud effects it's computer can do.

I was pricing out the components of the solaris for a while, and those 1-2W LED's get pretty pricey once you work in the cost of their power supplies. Not very economical to DIY...

speaking of economical, MH wins as king for costs if you understand how to solder a capacitor
__________________
Everything I put in my tank is fully dependant on me.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-14-2006, 12:46 PM
Fish's Avatar
Fish Fish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Okotoks, AB
Posts: 724
Fish is on a distinguished road
Default

Are you thinking of "Aquatinics" fixtures? They are getting some good reviews because they come with cooling fans and acrylic shields and their individual reflectors are all stacked in a parabolic shape so you get better mixing of light. Unfortunately, the ballasts on the aquatinics fixtures are 'hard start' and not as good as Sunlight Supply's. I know that the Sunlight Supply have been tested with fans and a par meter and that their output is better with active cooling... but I didn't think it was anywhere near 75% better! I thought it was more like 15-20%???

- Chad
__________________
Returning to the hobby after an eight year absence.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-14-2006, 02:45 PM
Farrmanchu Farrmanchu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 210
Farrmanchu is on a distinguished road
Default

I use 4 X 54 Watt T5HOs with individual parabolic reflectors, on my 55Gal display. I think the only thing I'm missing by not having Halides is "shimmer". I keep a Crocea a few inches off the bottom, and it looks great. I originally used only 2 bulbs, and when I went to 4, the Coraline on the top back of the tank actually bleached. When I get around to building the canopy it will be about 8 inches tall, low profile compared to Halides. The T5s also don't impact my Temp. as much as Halides. T5HO with a small Halide for "shimmer", IMO would be best.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-14-2006, 03:53 PM
littlesilvermax's Avatar
littlesilvermax littlesilvermax is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 779
littlesilvermax is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Farrmanchu View Post
I use 4 X 54 Watt T5HOs with individual parabolic reflectors, on my 55Gal display. I think the only thing I'm missing by not having Halides is "shimmer". I keep a Crocea a few inches off the bottom, and it looks great. I originally used only 2 bulbs, and when I went to 4, the Coraline on the top back of the tank actually bleached. When I get around to building the canopy it will be about 8 inches tall, low profile compared to Halides. The T5s also don't impact my Temp. as much as Halides. T5HO with a small Halide for "shimmer", IMO would be best.
I disagree with T5s or VHOs not affecting temp as much as halides. Flourescents put off a lot of heat too, it is just not as concentrated as a halide.

I think equal amounts of light = about the same amount of heat.

My halides affect my system by less then 1 degree F.
__________________
250 BB Starphire SPS, clams, & zoos
3 x 250 DE, IC 660 W/T5s
OM 4-way, Hammerhead Pump
Calcium, Kalk, RO filters, magnesium, Excellent prices
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-14-2006, 04:14 PM
kwirky's Avatar
kwirky kwirky is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,127
kwirky is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Farrmanchu View Post
I originally used only 2 bulbs, and when I went to 4, the Coraline on the top back of the tank actually bleached.
lol coraline doesn't grow in the top 8" of my own tank I've got a little porite frag up there now, and that's all there is for life up there. And the fixture is run ~7" from the water surface.

Quote:
Originally Posted by littlesilvermax View Post
I disagree with T5s or VHOs not affecting temp as much as halides. Flourescents put off a lot of heat too, it is just not as concentrated as a halide.
Agreed, my sunlight supply fixture (8 bulb 4' fixture) gave off crazy heat on my 120g. increased the temperature by 6-8 degrees without the 6", 100cfm AC fan! I think it was the light hitting the rocks, then warming the water. But it can really heat up the tank if I'm not careful. I run the fan on a timer to tweak evaporation/top-off, and I have to adjust it every once in a while.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fish View Post
Are you thinking of "Aquatinics" fixtures? ... I know that the Sunlight Supply have been tested with fans and a par meter and that their output is better with active cooling... but I didn't think it was anywhere near 75% better! I thought it was more like 15-20%???

- Chad
No, not the Aquatinics, I mean the ATI fixture is the "awesome" fixture from germany. Don't know if it's available yet, but I read about somone running one on a 120-240 transformer in order to review it, and it got an output of 320 (don't know what the reading was in. PAR, lux, dunno), compared to sunlight supply's 150. Somone on the same thread tested their sunlight supply fixture after active cooling was installed in the top (3 90mm computer fans), and it increased to 250. I just can't find the damned thread! ATI cools their fixtures to a specific temperature, and the reflectors are even coated in silver!

I remember reading somewhere, too, that measuring the PAR of flourescents is difficult compared to MH because of MH being a point source, and flourescents being a spread light. advanced aquarist had a good way of measuring a spread light source by measuring it the same way they measure MH reflectors. They used this method to review the solaris fixture.

http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2006/8/review2
__________________
Everything I put in my tank is fully dependant on me.

Last edited by kwirky; 11-14-2006 at 04:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.