Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-29-2005, 02:32 AM
inverted inverted is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6
inverted is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to inverted
Default To U.V. or not to U.V.

ohla all,

am thinking about putting a U.V. sterillizer in my upcoming Reef tank.

figure That If I put it on a timer to turn off for three hours after the phytoplankton is added that it should still be of benefit to the filter feeders.

However I'm concerned that U.V. might mutate some of the proteins and amino acids essential for the development of corals.

any one 'ave any expertise????



at your mercy

Sean.
__________________
If true bliss be in child eyes: Awaken my inner child and give me gills so I may blink at the amazement under sea.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-29-2005, 03:23 AM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

I ran UV for a while, nothing I noticed mutated. Many reefers use it, although many think that if you need to use it, you're doing something wrong. What is the purpose of your implementation?
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-29-2005, 06:23 AM
richtg's Avatar
richtg richtg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 123
richtg is on a distinguished road
Default

I've seen lots of great setups without them. IMO, they are more harmfull than beneficial. I was going to buy one myself at one point, but my research on the matter dissueded me. If you are just getting started, I would recommend priority on a good skimmer, lighting, and circulation above all else. Rich.
__________________
90gal Starfire mixed reef, 400W MH (Giesemann 13K megachrome/Icecap E-ballast), (2) 54W T5 Giesemann true actinic, 45gal sump (65W 50/50 PC), ASM G-3 Skimmer, Mak 4 return, Sequence Dart closed loop, foam backdrop, 120 lbs LR, 2" sandbed, & 1 dillhole running the show.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-29-2005, 06:26 AM
Jack's Avatar
Jack Jack is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 1,690
Jack is on a distinguished road
Default

I personally haven't used one but would like to try one out someday just for kicks.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-29-2005, 02:51 PM
Tom R's Avatar
Tom R Tom R is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 1,117
Tom R is on a distinguished road
Default

I have a UV sterilizer on my reef. I do not use it 24/7. I bought it as a control for ICK but use more as a control for algae blooms. It is very effective, within days it will reduce that yellow, green colour in the water to crystal clear.

Tom R
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-29-2005, 05:09 PM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

I have been running UV 24/7 for about a year now and I do think I am benifiting from it but yet I could not prove it if you asked.

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-30-2005, 12:30 AM
inverted inverted is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6
inverted is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to inverted
Default appreciaSEAN

As always, your opinions and experience are appreciated. thanx sooo much


(u.v. was intended for ick control)


Sean
__________________
If true bliss be in child eyes: Awaken my inner child and give me gills so I may blink at the amazement under sea.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-30-2005, 02:17 PM
phreezee phreezee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Calgary NW
Posts: 192
phreezee is on a distinguished road
Default

For Ich, it's not the greatest and from what I've read Ozone is better. I use UV 24/7 and the greatest benefit is algae control. My experiment was to shut it off for a week and during my weekly maintenance I found I had to clean the glass considerably more than when I had it on.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-30-2005, 03:33 PM
Beverly's Avatar
Beverly Beverly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Edmonton
Posts: 3,560
Beverly is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phreezee
I use UV 24/7 and the greatest benefit is algae control. My experiment was to shut it off for a week and during my weekly maintenance I found I had to clean the glass considerably more than when I had it on.
Don't use UV sterilizers, but don't have much of an algae problem on the glass of any of my three tanks, either. Must be the low bioload of each tank, weekly water changes and other maintenance, or other contributing factors.
__________________
Beverly
~~~~~

Beverly's 10g Nano YouTube Channel
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-30-2005, 04:07 PM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Rest In Peace
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kamloops BC
Posts: 4,920
Doug has disabled reputation
Default

I used them a lot in the 80,s but never really knew why.

Seems as if they are becoming popular again, esp. with the bare bottomed sps tank crowd.

As does the use of ozone, which waspopular in the 90,s reef aquariums.
__________________
Doug
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.