#211
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
Quote:
And on that train of thought, it has been proven that some corals will appear different under the various light technologies. This again is yet another reason why people simply PREFER one technology over another. They might simply PREFER how corals appear under a particular technology. |
#212
|
|||||
|
|||||
I like the look of the water with the radion.but I love it under halide. Less shadowing. I could have solved that with another radion but on a 24" tank it's pointless
I didn't care for that much shimmer of the led Growth rate for me...some pieces grew under led some not so much. But I will say growth has double under the halide. As for color. I am seeing more color with the halide. Plain and simple. I have one piece that was green under the radion and now is blue violet with green and yellow undertones. So nice I had to name it I do miss the amount of blues I can add with led but its a factor I can live with or fix. |
#213
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
As for the looks, yes, T5s are nice, but I can adjust my LED colours to anything I want, and by time of day. I can make SPS glow, if I want... I run mine on the Natural Mode which simulates the sun through the day, and my corals seem to really like it. SPS keeps growing like crazy and getting good colour out of everything. I tried playing with different colours, but I honestly don't like the "artificial" look. And I have seen some tanks like that, and each to their own, I guess. IMO, I think a lot of non-LED users here are being very much misled. Maybe some LEDs are not as good, and maybe some people don't know how to use theirs properly with all the different settings and adjustments. But my Radions (both Gen 1s and Gen 2s) have all worked flawlessly from day 1, and I couldn't be happier with them.
__________________
Reef Pilot's Undersea Oasis: http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/sho...d.php?t=102101 Frags FS: http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/sho...d.php?t=115022 Solutions are easy. The real difficulty lies in discovering the problem. |
#214
|
|||||
|
|||||
Ok so back to square one, the original question who else is ditching LED for other options
we have proved LED works if you employ the right fixture, we have proved T5 work we have proved MH work. so what other options other than the above are people moving to? Am i missing some new technology? In regards to the point people are dumping LED because they dont like the look, I find this impossible to understand as (again) providing you are using a worthy fixture if you dont like the look just change the spectrum, easier than you can with any T5 or MH. So the argument is not growth not colour, not health ........Ok Im lost |
#215
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
|
#216
|
|||||
|
|||||
The latter half of this thread make me want to unplug my tank and let it die...
|
#217
|
|||||
|
|||||
I hear where you are coming from, I think the plot has been lost. Or I have simply lost the plot
|
#218
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
........ |
#219
|
|||||
|
|||||
I was able to grow huge colonies from frags with LED. But when you want the coverage and brightness, you need to spend big $$$. This is where the line was drawn for me.
Maybe LED's have too many options and not enough testing. You can easily tune yourself out of an acceptable range for your corals. I would invest in an LED again if there were limited presets with static height/coverage requirements. Don't over sell/rate your product and give the customer an educated recipe for optimal coral color and growth. |
#220
|
|||||
|
|||||
This is something that GHL have thought about doing. A cut down unit with known workable presets, bit like using different preset T5 tubes.
|
Tags |
aqua digital, pukani |
|
|