![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I love the last coral as well. What is it?
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() That last one is a Red Plant.
*I can neither confirm nor deny that it is or is not ORA. |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() That baby is sweet
![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I read that at proper depth and light green will come out on red planet just havent seen it. Very nice.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() absolutly amazing photos.. how and what camera set up do you use?
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Totally agree... Keep those amazing shots coming!
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() This debate is still on going???
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() OH EM G-O-S-H !! I wrote that comment just for you !
![]() Thanks! Canon 6D with 24-105mm lens or Canon 40D with 28-75mm lens depending on my mood. |
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Big price difference between these two - for the average reef photographer, do you prefer one over the other? I'm looking at upgrading from my old G9. Or do you think it's more about the lens than the body?
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]() I actually have no preference between the two camera bodies (for reef photography). In fact, a few years ago I had an even older, cheaper, smaller Canon Rebel (entry level Digital SLR) that I used to take photos with. If I still had it today I would use that camera with one of my prized lenses and still produce the same images. If someone asked me for my recommendation I would say get the whatever camera body you want. For general photography (including reef photo taking, etc), they are all virtually the same. A $300 DSLR vs a $3000 SLR. Then get a really good lens. My 24-104 mm and 28-75 mm lenses are both very good lenses. If I put either of those lenses on a $300 entry level DSL or a $3000 high end DSLR they can/will take the exact same picture. |