![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I think you just answered the debate
A reactor is much less work as far as I understand |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() No question in my mind. For a 180 with any amount of SPS, Ca reactor is the way to go. I regret I didn't do it sooner.
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() typical ocean water is Ca-420, Alk-7 and Mg only 1280, personal experience easier to bring the Ca up if Mg isn't low.
__________________
my tank Last edited by mark; 03-01-2015 at 08:53 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I have kind of a dumb question, but if you have a calcium reactor, do you not have to dose alk? I have a doser and my sps are growing like crazy. It's getting a little expensive for chemicals.
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Nope, no dosing alk for me. The dissolution of the aragonite media boosts both the Ca and alk.
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() zactly!
__________________
Brad |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Good to know. Not sure how I missed that along the way. Never stop learning in this hobby.
|