Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Freshwater

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-15-2014, 01:47 AM
Drfu Drfu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Calgary
Posts: 97
Drfu is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StirCrazy View Post
also remember Calgary has very hard water to start with, get a water report for your area and see what kinds of chemicles/elements are in it, take that number and tripple it and decide if you want that in your tank. remember thoes meters you are thinking of won't tell you what makes up the TDS only what the final number is.
also there are several water quality reports from lakes that might have the type of fish you have you can look at to compare. I find people do everything they can to get the perfect water quality for there salt water thanks but then just use tap water and not worry about it with there fresh water tanks, water quality is just as important for one as the other.

Steve
Here is what i found about Calgary water:

Basic Water Chemistry (< or < means not detected)
Colour
TCU b
<2
<15 e
Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Hardness as CaCO3
mg/L
140-245
500 mg/L e
Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
pH
pH
6.8-8.2
6.5-8.5 e
Influenced by the dissolved minerals in the water and water treatment
Temperature
°C
1.3-19.4
<15 °C e
Surface-water temperature
Total dissolved solids
mg/L
177-294
<500 e
Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Turbidity
NTU c
<0.05-0.16
1.0 g
Suspended particles in solution
Inorganic Substances
Aluminum
mg/L
0.0189-0.2889
0.1 f
Plant treatment
Arsenic
mg/L
<0.0005-0.0005
0.01
Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Barium mg/L 0.0306-0.0833 1.0 Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Cadmium
mg/L
<0.0005
0.005
Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Calcium
mg/L
35-69
No limit
Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Free Chlorine residual
mg/L
0.75-1.36
>0.2
Plant treatment
Chromium
mg/L
<0.0005-0.0021
0.05
Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Copper
mg/L
<0.0005-0.0017
<1.0 e
Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Fluoridek
mg/L
<0.06-0.28
1.5
Naturally occurring plus plant treatment
Iron
mg/L
<0.050
<0.3 e
Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Lead
mg/L
<0.0005

0.01
Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Magnesium
mg/L
10-19
No limit
Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Manganese mg/L <0.0005-0.0143 <0.05 Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Mercury
mg/L
<0.00005
0.001
Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Nickel
mg/L
<0.0005-0.0017
No limit
Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Nitrate as Nitrogen mg/L 0.042-0.183 10 Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Nitrite as Nitrogen mg/L <0.0044-0.0080 1.0 Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Potassium
mg/L
0.35-1.54
No limit
Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Sodium
mg/L
1.4-14.4
<200 e
Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Sulfate mg/L 36-124 <500 e Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Zinc
mg/L
<0.0030-0.0123
<5.0 e
Erosion of natural deposits in watershed
Microbiological Organisms (<1 means not detected)
E. coli
MPN/100 mL d
<1
0
Domestic animals, wildlife and human waste
Total Coliform
MPN/100 mL d
<1
0
Soil, domestic animals, and wildlife

TREATED WATER IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

Water Quality Parameter
Units
Drinking Water
Limit a
Major Source
Volatile Organic Substances
Total Trihalomethanes h
mg/L
0.0262
0.1
By-product of chlorination
Microbiological Organisms
E. coli i
MPN/100 ml d
Absent
0
Domestic animals, wildlife, and human waste
Total coliforms i
MPN/100 ml d
Absent
0
Soil, domestic animals, and wildlife


Really have no clue if thats bad or good? Your advice is to use RO/DI water in the tank, not waste water, others say use waste & only one person says don't do it. I guess i will have to make my own decision, but based on everything i have read so far i see not too many issues with using rodi as long as i have some supplements if in fact my tank will not ofer them naturally. I do have a combo of sand/gravel for substrate, two pieces of driftwood, lots of plants and two large filters
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-15-2014, 01:58 AM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drfu View Post

Really have no clue if thats bad or good? Your advice is to use RO/DI water in the tank, not waste water, others say use waste & only one person says don't do it. I guess i will have to make my own decision, but based on everything i have read so far i see not too many issues with using rodi as long as i have some supplements if in fact my tank will not ofer them naturally. I do have a combo of sand/gravel for substrate, two pieces of driftwood, lots of plants and two large filters
ya reading them is always fun eh., what I am setting up here is one of thoes big chemical bladders in the aluminum frames. they hold about 2000L of liquid, so I am going to put my reject into that for watering plants and the garden. My dad uses about 6 of them in Alberta to colect rainwater, but rain is one thing we don't have to much of here

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.