![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
And on that train of thought, it has been proven that some corals will appear different under the various light technologies. This again is yet another reason why people simply PREFER one technology over another. They might simply PREFER how corals appear under a particular technology. |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I like the look of the water with the radion.but I love it under halide. Less shadowing. I could have solved that with another radion but on a 24" tank it's pointless
I didn't care for that much shimmer of the led Growth rate for me...some pieces grew under led some not so much. But I will say growth has double under the halide. As for color. I am seeing more color with the halide. Plain and simple. I have one piece that was green under the radion and now is blue violet with green and yellow undertones. So nice I had to name it ![]() I do miss the amount of blues I can add with led but its a factor I can live with or fix. |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Ok so back to square one, the original question who else is ditching LED for other options
we have proved LED works if you employ the right fixture, we have proved T5 work we have proved MH work. so what other options other than the above are people moving to? Am i missing some new technology? In regards to the point people are dumping LED because they dont like the look, I find this impossible to understand as (again) providing you are using a worthy fixture if you dont like the look just change the spectrum, easier than you can with any T5 or MH. So the argument is not growth not colour, not health ........Ok Im lost ![]() |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
I don't understand why this is impossible to understand? Let me ask you this, what brand of jeans do you wear, and why do you wear that particular brand of jeans ? There are so many options, why did you pick that one ? I will bet money that we both wear different brands of jeans. Which one is better? NEITHER. |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Of course everyone will have different tastes thats why consumerism is king, which kind of makes this whole debate pointless. everyone will have their own opinion.
So here is my opinion - For me my love of LED and I was one of the early adopters was the fact i did not have to change bulbs, I could change the spectrum and intensity at a drop of a hat and they gave off no heat so no need for bulky chiller. Then came lamps with immense quality and functionality that MH and T5 simply could not provide in ONE package they either had one of the other. My previous tanks had MH, I loved MH but it could not be dimmed, was costly in bulbs and I needed a chiller. LED's filled the void what MH could not offer. I now run a lamp on my tank that both i and others that have seen them do believe replicate what MH gives but with brass nobs on ![]() This whole thread is about own perception and opinion, I dont think it will ever prove anything, however to the deepest respect to Aquattro I dont think he was trying to make a point or prove a point just a question that is now way removed from the original post? Last edited by Aqua-Digital; 10-28-2013 at 11:20 PM. |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() God please please please close it now.
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() What? It's a great topic. Kind of what this site is about rather than a thread about "What is a corporation".
I bought my LEDs cause it was the newset and coolest and big hype at the time. Did'nt do as much research as I should have, but I was on a budget. I chose AIs and glad I did. I dont consider them a low end set of lights as many of you call them. There's alot of tweaking involved and trial and error to try and get that look from T5s and MHs and many have acheived it or are damn close. I'm happy and wont be getting out of the latest fad. The Hydras are IME a way better light than the Sols and Vega's |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Yes the subject is very appropriate and I like reading about others experiences and opinions but its someones relentless push to have everyone conform to their way of thinking and opinion that has me a wee bit bent. I have LED and think they're fine.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I love LEDs too. I have DIY units using 10w emitters in 3 white & 2 blue spectrums, as well as inexpensive Chinese units. I get good colour & growth with my LEDs, never worry about the electric bill or bulb expense or heat. Once I do my switch over to setup my 93g 30" cube, I will be lighting up 3 display & 1 frag tank (total volume 383g & total surface area 26 sq.ft.) using a total of 450w maximum and 370w normal setting.
At my max. I had 10 halides (3x250w DE & 7x 150w DE) generating a tonne of heat (at least I didn't have to turn on the heat in the house in the winter) and needing 10 new bulbs replaced each year. Every summer I had to go on reverse photoperiod, use fans over each tank, and leave windows and doors open late at night to capture some cooler night air. 10 bulbs at say $65 each+tax is about $700+. My electric bill would be through the roof if I still had all those tanks and all those MH (rated at 1800w but actually consumed well over 2000w/hr use). These DIY units grow my Purple valida and Bonsai great, with deep purple colouration. Great for LPS & anemones, which is mostly what I'm into. So I'm another LED convert (over 2 years now) who will be sticking with LEDs. |
![]() |
Tags |
aqua digital, pukani |
|
|