![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() wow...thx all for the great posts---so far
![]() |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Smaller tank = less maintenance, less costs annually, and if poo hits the fan, there is some solice in knowing that u have lost only $500+ on coral and fish vs. $5000+.
Nano-reefs do limit in fish selection, but still allow for your fav corals. Water changes alone on a nano will eliminate need for dosing and potentially a skimmer depending on bio-load. IMO! |
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Yeah I would also stick to a nice small tank. Say a 72" X 36" X 24" Not too big but plenty of room for all the corals and fish you know you will want.
![]()
__________________
So many ideas, so little money! |