How Many Mitras?

[Bblinks]

Originally Posted by Aqua-Digital

Totally different lamp against the Mitras you just cant compare the coverage intensity or spectrum that's why they are sub $500 and you need so many.

There is no way you can put an Ai SOL against a Mitras.

Spectrum lacking for sure but coverage 2 to 1 is very similar. As far as intensity goes AI sols are par monster. Don't knock it because its a sub $400 lamp. It will grow sps just as fast if not faster then any other lighting system out there. They just don't reflect certain color of the coral due to missing spectrum.

[sphelps]

Well once again it comes down to this all being completely useless without pictures Especially when someone tells a guy with Radions that a Mitra spread is like two Sols.

Here's a pic of my tank with only the center Mitra on to give an idea on spread. The view-able size within the framing is marked, the actual glass is 64x32.625 and the bottom of the light is 8" above the water surface which is approximately 2" below the top of the Euro brace. From bottom of light to sand the distance is approximately 37".



I bumped up the contrast quite a bit to kind of show the line better but honestely it blends so well it's hard to see it. Draw your own conclusions from this.

[Aquattro]

Originally Posted by sphelps

. Draw your own conclusions from this.

I'd say that looks exactly like 2 SOLs worth of spread. Maybe less.

[Aqua-Digital]

Originally Posted by Aquattro

I'd say that looks exactly like 2 SOLs worth of spread. Maybe less.

seriously?

what about the optical spotting due to the high degree angled lenses?

Dont get me wrong the Ai is an awesome fixture for the price but you cant put the two anywhere near in the same performance bracket. You do get what you pay for.

But this is distracting from the original question and I must apologize for the detraction this is not a thread about trying to prove a sub $400 lamp = a high end $1200 lamp. that can be for another thread.

Back on topic - Steve has highlighted that yes 3 would be enough 4 would be optimum

[kien]

Originally Posted by sphelps

I bumped up the contrast quite a bit

Photoshopped!!! I call shenanigans!

[Aqua-Digital]

Originally Posted by kien

Photoshopped!!! I call shenanigans!

[sphelps]

Originally Posted by kien

Photoshopped!!! I call shenanigans!

If I didn't bump it up the whole tank would look fairly well lit.

[kien]

Originally Posted by sphelps

If I didn't bump it up the whole tank would look fairly well lit.

dang! That one unit looks like it lit the whole freaking tank!

[sphelps]

Originally Posted by kien

dang! That one unit looks like it lit the whole freaking tank!

Honestly one light actually looks pretty good, if I ran it parallel it would be even better. Something to keep in mind as well, the tank is 32" front to back and the spread you're seeing is the shorter length.

And while spread isn't everything I don't have any issues keeping virtually any coral anywhere in this tank. Clams in the sand, no issue.

[subman]

I still stand by the statement that I could probably run 2 in parallel and cover my 72x30x24 tank and yes its almost entirely sps. I prefer the three units. Four would be overkill and I would probably only be able to run them at 50%.