![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Running three nutrient export systems could be fighting each other.
Pellets being a carbon source will remove both no3 and po4. Along with gfo you could starve your macro cause it to deteriorate adding back to the system. Though I have no experience with pellets I believe to much to fast strips the water to quick. I would pick one or the other for nutrient export either macro and gfo or carbon If you choose to go the Biopellets Route. Consider this I run prodibio a form of carbon dosing. While I also ran gfo I was never happy with tank. I was cleaning tank more than I would have liked. I stopped running gfo. One week after stopping gfo. I had a algae bloom I cleaned it all up and from there on after the system balanced out and I have no nutrients. I clean my glass weekly. I also filled my reactor with hydroton since I no longer use gfo. Just so you know I run a sps and clam garden Good luck |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Thank you Titus. As far as I know BioPellets is removing NO3 and not PO4. GFO removes PO4. I am running refugium and BioBellets for short time, as I was witing for Pellets to kick off. These 2 are overlaping - agree, but I plan to remove Refugium from my system and have just Pellets and GFO with Carbon, Pellets are skimmed. Kein can chime on this as he is more professional.
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() IMO carbon and gfo don't work together. Its a balance for the bacteria to remove both no3 and po4. And with gfo stripping the po4 first the bacteria never really acomplish its job.
Biopellets does remove po4. But you need a balanced ratio. Po4 will take longer but once the ratio is balanced out they will both drop. If you don't have a balance the the bacteria could stall not removing its potential But ask kien Last edited by Proteus; 03-29-2013 at 03:02 PM. |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I would remove gfo to allow for Biopellets to work at the intended potential. And macro shortly after. The bacteria culture cannot mature without nutrient for it to feed on. You may have a small spike in po4 but it will soon deminish. Also a WC during that time will help.
Once you remove macro more rubble in sump will also be benificial Albert dao turned me on to hydroton in a reactor. With low flow and darkness you can achive a cryptic zone for sponge to grow also filterin water And only feed what you need. Any more is just waste and nutrients. Also consider doseing micro bacter 7. Others on here can chime in to that but apparently its benificial to use with pellets Last edited by Proteus; 03-29-2013 at 03:16 PM. |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Titus do you droton? Never heard about, have a link for with more info on this hydroton? How to build and benefit? For now I will run Pellets, Carbon and Skimmer will see what happens. I don't want to shut down pellets as it's been about a month running. I just opened it to clean some debris on cap of Pellets reactor. Hope that would not disturb the process
![]() |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() You won't find info about hydroton in a reef tank. But u will find info on cryptic zones
Not related to you issue but since you may have a m t reactor: Hydrton is small expanded Clay marble that are used in the hydrponics industry. Hydroton is inert and very porus. Making it a great material for natural biological filtration. It would be the same as live rock rubble in sump. But if you can keep it dark and have relitivly low flow you will create a breeding ground for sponges and small feather dusters to grow filtering out water. As you said you want to create a low nutrient system I started this after ditching gfo and have had no negative affects. If you want more info ask Albert dao.He Is a pretty good guy |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() ok. Lights ar on and I took some pictures. Actually looks a bit better - not so cloudy today:
![]() Upset Green Pocci: ![]() Lost color Acro: ![]() Red Planet RTN: ![]() What would be best approach to save these frags? |