Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Marine Fish

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-07-2013, 04:20 AM
The Grizz's Avatar
The Grizz The Grizz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: 15 min NE of Red Deer
Posts: 5,470
The Grizz will become famous soon enough
Default

6' or longer for tangs would be my choice. If you get small size tangs eventually you will need an upgrade. I have a 8' - 165 gal but in the process of building a 8' - 300 gal.
__________________
Feed the bear goodies, make a new friend, don't feed the bear...............

8' - 165gal Reef
DIY LED's Build
2012 Nano Contest Winner
Febuary 2013 POTM Winner
300 gal + 60 gal Complete DIY Build
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-07-2013, 04:28 AM
Xyres Xyres is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 38
Xyres is on a distinguished road
Default

Yeah I was planning on going a 6' long tank just to save some space length wise but going around a 180 to 240. I am just wondering because I need to consider costs of running that much water plus the sump.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-07-2013, 05:27 AM
naesco's Avatar
naesco naesco is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,747
naesco is on a distinguished road
Default Six foot minimum for tangs

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Grizz View Post
6' or longer for tangs would be my choice. If you get small size tangs eventually you will need an upgrade. I have a 8' - 165 gal but in the process of building a 8' - 300 gal.
As usual Grizz is right. Six foot is a minimum. Tangs are swimmers. They spend all of their time swimming to and fro and require the length that larger tanks provide. Thank you for asking.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-07-2013, 05:32 AM
Xyres Xyres is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 38
Xyres is on a distinguished road
Default

Well thank you guys for answering.
If I am going to be dropping a fair amount of money on an upgrade I want to make sure that everthing is going to be right for my fish and that they will be happy.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-07-2013, 08:45 AM
chevyjaxon's Avatar
chevyjaxon chevyjaxon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 309
chevyjaxon is on a distinguished road
Default

Its been often said that in Marine bigger is better. If you own your own house, build as big as you can fit!
__________________
always just 2cents until im broke
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-07-2013, 08:55 AM
lpsreefer's Avatar
lpsreefer lpsreefer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Calgary (NE Country hills)
Posts: 513
lpsreefer is on a distinguished road
Default

Very well put. Do you own your own house?
Where are you going to put the tank?
Can your floor support the tank?
How big are your doorways to bring a tank in or build one on site?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-07-2013, 10:30 AM
albert_dao albert_dao is offline
Good Guy Albert
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,035
albert_dao will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to albert_dao
Default

You need a 5000' long tank minimum.
__________________
This and that.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-07-2013, 03:37 PM
kien's Avatar
kien kien is offline
¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸. ><(((º>
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 7,665
kien will become famous soon enoughkien will become famous soon enough
Default

Just don't forget to consider your ongoing maintenance budget. In my opinion there is a point where bigger is not always better. Bigger is also more expensive; time and money. More water means larger water changes, more salt, a larger more expensive skimmer, more lights, heating, cooling, etc..

For example, if today you had to the time, the space and money to set up a 150g 6 foot tank or a 500g 6 foot tank choosing the 500g because "bigger is always better" might not actually be better in the long term. The 500g tank is going to cost you more in time and money to maintain. This tends to be the cause of many tank shut downs.

Having said that, some people are perfectly fine maintaining larger tanks long term :-)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-07-2013, 05:40 PM
wickedfrags's Avatar
wickedfrags wickedfrags is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 1,319
wickedfrags is on a distinguished road
Default

Agree on the 6' length.

Rather than upgrading selling the fish is another option!!! At least that is what I will be doing should the time come. The "tang" quantity in my 90 might get me hanged on some boards, despite their current short stature.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Grizz View Post
6' or longer for tangs would be my choice. If you get small size tangs eventually you will need an upgrade. I have a 8' - 165 gal but in the process of building a 8' - 300 gal.
__________________
I'm out.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-07-2013, 05:55 PM
naesco's Avatar
naesco naesco is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,747
naesco is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wickedfrags View Post
Agree on the 6' length.

Rather than upgrading selling the fish is another option!!! At least that is what I will be doing should the time come. The "tang" quantity in my 90 might get me hanged on some boards, despite their current short stature.
Rather than selling the tangs which is a lot more difficult to do than you realize as you really get attached to them, reward yourself for good husbandry and get a 6 footer for yourself.
It is just an extra two feet!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.