![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Deeper generally just means more wasted space for the same volume. To compensate for the depth of my 50gal I grew frags for a little while in suspension. It was sort of a fun and unique thing to do for a while but it meant more maintenance because the fishing line would get quite slimy. It was also quite difficult to do anything in the tank with my hands as I kept bumping the hanging rods.
I now use a slightly shallower 140gal stock trough which cost about the same as a new 50gal glass tank but doesn't require nearly the same amount of cleaning and obviously provides a much larger square footage. ![]()
__________________
"We shall dive down through black abysses... and in that lair of the Deep Ones we shall dwell amidst wonder and glory forever." - H.P. Lovecraft Old 120gal Tank Journal New 225gal Tank Journal May 2010 TOTM The 10th Annual Prince George Reef Tank Tour |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I am guessing the pic above was your deeper tank. I have seen pics of that tank in the past.
Perhaps this subject is a no brainer (shallower is better) but I was interested in it after I saw a you tube video of "tidal gardens" greenhouse and how they raise their corals. I would imagine in aquaculture some of the rationale for set up would also be risk mitigation. A shallow tank seems obvious to me for light penetration. The thing I was wondering about was if you have a variety of coral with different requirements can too little depth become a risk with lighting as either bulbs age and you replenish them or even if you switch between different types of lighting? |