![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() In my personal experience Cyano if introduced to the tank on a coral or piece of rock can thrive in a well balanced and mature reef tank. Yes yes I know algae needs light and nutrients but I have seen several cases where the stuff needs to be eradicated in order to get rid of it and then said tanks are fine afterwards. So I have used Chemi clean and find it works very well. If your nitrates are low/undetectable and you have good flow new bulbs and are not overfeeding I would recommend it and given the above it should not come back. Be careful to follow the directions though I always add an air pump line for oxygenation turn the skimmer off (if you decide to turn it on!) and follow the directions on the water change.
On the skimmer note I must admit I dont have a lot of faith in skimming. I dont disagree that it has a purpose and becuase it is used in industrial applications that to me gives more creedence to it. But the articles I have read on the amount of organics removed by typical aquarium skimmers makes me doubt their overall utility as a must have. With that said I have a couple and use them just like everyone else I think they are a component to a healthy reef tank but not the be all end all in my opinion (thats why I will never own a Bubble King lol....) |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() IMO, running a skimmer-less tank is asking your fish to continue to swim in their own pee
![]() BTW, cyano is not an algae, not that there's anything wrong with that ... |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Yes your right its not lol I slipped on that one but I think we subject them to pee baths either way lol That's why I believe in water changes
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I wasn't 'finger pointin'
![]() I see cyano called algae a lot, and more than once in this post I still like using my skimmer I get about 250ml per week of very skanky stuff, so I think it's beneficial to run one On the other hand, I've seen some pretty nice tanks this last year that are skimmer-less so, in the hands of learned reefers, I guess either way is OK ![]() The only other thing that comes to mind is whether or not running skimmer-less gives your home a fishy smell |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() [quote=gregzz4;775502
The only other thing that comes to mind is whether or not running skimmer-less gives your home a fishy smell[/QUOTE] Well when I dont empty my skimmer cup for 4-5 days my basement where my sump is smells like an effluent plant, but my skimmer cup is about the size of a pail of ice cream. And Palmer you would have a change of opinion on the Bubble King skimmrs after running one on your tank for a while. I've tried alot of different skimmers and you cant beat them IMO. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Skimmerless and sumpless for 7 months,but to much boidiversity and bioload so skimmer being installed this weekend.finite space ,poor rocks can only do so much
![]() |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() You know I totally believe you I would probably love it but my tank is in good shape and has been without significant issue so I dont want to find out I want to remain naive lol... I would rather put the additional money into an expensive controller or another expensive powerhead.
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
I'd like to keep it skimmer less as it really has been doing well. I find my 180 has more of a fishy smell than this one. I'll test nitrates and phosphates tonight too and post later. |
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
It makes sense if you feed your 50 less than your 180, or different WCs, or the Bioload ... Something about your 50 may be 'cleaner' And something I meant to add awhile back ... If it's working well the way it is now, don't fix it ![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() mine 's in my showroom at work ,no stinking allowed!therefore it doesn't stink except for reef crystals odor
![]() |