Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > DIY

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-19-2012, 07:27 AM
kien's Avatar
kien kien is offline
¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸. ><(((º>
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 7,665
kien will become famous soon enoughkien will become famous soon enough
Default

Fascinating :-)

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-19-2012, 08:41 AM
SeaHorse_Fanatic SeaHorse_Fanatic is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 4,880
SeaHorse_Fanatic will become famous soon enough
Default

You're planning to add greater complexity and risk into the system. Imagine the disaster that would ensue if the mixing process doesn't work properly and you add saturated sw into your display. Salinity would spike and probably kill a lot of livestock. Just my thoughts.
__________________
If you see it, can take care of it, better get it or put it on hold. Otherwise, it'll be gone & you'll regret it!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-19-2012, 02:20 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

Install a conductivity probe in your tank/sump to control salinity, not your salt bin. Setup two tops offs, one from fresh water the other from saturated salt solution. Program controller to use fresh water if salinity => traget, and saltwater if < target. Set alarm if salinity drops below a certain point to remind you to refill salt. You can program a pump to remove water from your display on a timer, set top off control to allow extra top off time during this interval.

Something like this which is what I'm implementing, I've done a few similar ones before but you need a controller like profilux.

I never had issues relating to calcium, alkalinity, or other measurable elements as far as I could tell. Auto water changes were kept small and on a daily bases to prevent large swings and they system also had a reactor or dosing system due to high demand.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-19-2012, 04:43 PM
Seth81's Avatar
Seth81 Seth81 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 189
Seth81 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
Install a conductivity probe in your tank/sump to control salinity, not your salt bin. Setup two tops offs, one from fresh water the other from saturated salt solution. Program controller to use fresh water if salinity => traget, and saltwater if < target. Set alarm if salinity drops below a certain point to remind you to refill salt. You can program a pump to remove water from your display on a timer, set top off control to allow extra top off time during this interval.

Something like this which is what I'm implementing, I've done a few similar ones before but you need a controller like profilux.

I never had issues relating to calcium, alkalinity, or other measurable elements as far as I could tell. Auto water changes were kept small and on a daily bases to prevent large swings and they system also had a reactor or dosing system due to high demand.

I have a PLC based control system, so most of this isn't a problem, the only challenge I would have is finding economical conductivity/salinity probes that output either a 4-20mA signal or a 0 - 5 VDC signal. Any one have any suggestions? I looked on ebay and found some rosemount ones...but too much money.

Also isn't it better to do larger water changes? I personally do weekly 10% changes. But after doing some math it seems to me larger less frequent changes helps in reducing pollutants

I really like your idea of adding a high point drain to your RO/DI tank, I may do the same for some added reassurance that I don't flood anything if a relay decides to stick (even though I'm using SIL rated relays).

I personally prefer the third tank setup I'm using rather then two and mixing SSW in the sump, just for the added reasurance I guess... but realistically I am sure we all have a single point of failure in our reef setups that could cause a crash.

Also isn't larger less frequent water changes more effective in reducing pollutant levels? I personally do weekly 10% changes.

Last edited by Seth81; 11-19-2012 at 04:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-19-2012, 04:49 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

Can you rig up a Neptune probe?
http://www.jlaquatics.com/product/np...ity+Probe.html
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-19-2012, 05:28 PM
kien's Avatar
kien kien is offline
¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸. ><(((º>
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 7,665
kien will become famous soon enoughkien will become famous soon enough
Default

Somewhat related to this discussion, Steve, have you ever noticed your conductivity probe randomly read an incorrect value? I have thought about doing something similar in the past but I have found my salinity probe to be quite unreliable. Maybe I just have a bad probe? My probe (for my Profilux) can read the conductivity fine, but every once in a while it will ready a very inaccurate value. When I notice this I sometimes shaking the probe which helps. Sometimes it corrects itself. I've tried putting my probe in low, medium and high flow area but it still does this from time to time. For example, my probe has been reading 1.021 for the past couple of days but I know for a fact that it is 1.026. Anyway, I really don't trust my conductivity probe at all.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-19-2012, 05:51 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kien View Post
Somewhat related to this discussion, Steve, have you ever noticed your conductivity probe randomly read an incorrect value? I have thought about doing something similar in the past but I have found my salinity probe to be quite unreliable. Maybe I just have a bad probe? My probe (for my Profilux) can read the conductivity fine, but every once in a while it will ready a very inaccurate value. When I notice this I sometimes shaking the probe which helps. Sometimes it corrects itself. I've tried putting my probe in low, medium and high flow area but it still does this from time to time. For example, my probe has been reading 1.021 for the past couple of days but I know for a fact that it is 1.026. Anyway, I really don't trust my conductivity probe at all.
Mine seems pretty stable as every time I check it matches my refractometer but I measure salinity rather than specific gravity as I recall issues in the past relating to programming the controller to display readings in SG, something about a gravity offset calculation or something, can't remember. Anyway you should try recording the actual conductivity over time and see if that is changing before ruling anything out.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-19-2012, 06:33 PM
Seth81's Avatar
Seth81 Seth81 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 189
Seth81 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
Thats just the sensor part, I would also need a transmitter to go with it. I've seen a few guys on RC have built thier own transmitter to be used with any standard sensor, but IMO off the shelf solutions would probably work better then any transmitter I built myself.

Last time I tried designing my own DC amplifier for the field winding of an AC generator it looked like crap, worked but burnt out in about 30 seconds... Hence why i'm not an electronics engineer.

something like this would work, http://www.omega.com/ppt/pptsc.asp?ref=CDTX90 I would need the transmitter for $620 plus probe $320... just a wee bit iver the budget, there must be a more economical transmitter out there.

Last edited by Seth81; 11-19-2012 at 06:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-19-2012, 06:44 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

Yeah you could pick up a full aquarium controller for that, might be an option although I get the idea behind building your own controller but at the same time kind of seems like reinventing the wheel a little.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-19-2012, 06:49 PM
Zoaelite's Avatar
Zoaelite Zoaelite is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,461
Zoaelite is on a distinguished road
Default

Have you taken in account the calcium bicarbonate precipitation that will occur with highly elevated levels of both calcium and HCO3-?

I have a feeling your pump would kick out on you in the span of a day with that much abiotic precipitation.

Quoted from Randy Holmes-Farley here:

Quote:
When Ω = 1, the solution is exactly saturated. When Ω exceeds one, it is supersaturated, and when Ω is less than 1, the solution is undersaturated. The higher the supersaturation, the more likely precipitation of CaCO3 will take place.

In normal seawater, Ω ~ 3 for aragonite and Ω ~ 5 for calcite, though these values have been steadily dropping as carbon dioxide has been added to the atmosphere, reducing the seawater's pH. Aragonite and calcite are just different crystalline forms of calcium carbonate. Calcite is slightly more stable, and hence slightly less soluble, than aragonite (i.e., has a lower Ksp*). Organisms can precipitate both aragonite (pteropods and corals) and calcite (foraminifera and coccoliths), but most of the precipitation in reef aquaria is aragonite (although certain organisms such as abalone form both).

Reef aquaria often have higher alkalinity and calcium levels than seawater, and hence are more supersaturated than seawater. Alkalinity is a measure of the bicarbonate and carbonate in solution. At a fixed pH, if the alkalinity is doubled, then the carbonate will also be doubled. Since many aquarists keep reef aquaria at alkalinity levels higher than natural seawater levels (2.5 meq/L; 7 dKH), the supersaturation is often higher than in the ocean.

The biggest driver of supersaturation in a reef aquarium, however, might be pH. In aquaria with a high pH (such as many aquaria using limewater) the supersaturation is much higher than in seawater. At the same alkalinity, if you raise the pH, you convert some of the bicarbonate into carbonate:

(7) HCO3 - + OH- → CO3- - + H2O

At pH 8.2 and 25°C, only 15% of the total carbonate and bicarbonate is present as carbonate. At pH 7.8, that value drops to 7%. But as the pH is raised, that portion increases to 50% at pH 8.93 and to 75% at pH 9.4. Consequently, as the pH is raised at a fixed alkalinity, the concentration of carbonate rises, thereby increasing the supersaturation of calcium carbonate. Within the pH range of most reef tanks (up to about pH 9 or so), the amount of carbonate present is approximately linear with the pH because of the relationship seen in equation (7). So if the pH rises from 7.5 to 8.5, there is approximately a ten-fold increase in the carbonate concentration. From pH 8.0 to 8.5, the increase in carbonate is about threefold. Above pH 9, the carbonate concentration continues to rise, but more slowly, and it levels off above about pH 10 as there is very little bicarbonate left at pH 10+ to convert into carbonate.

Calcium Carbonate Precipitation: Calcium, Alkalinity, and pH

Combining the various factors described above, here are some combinations of calcium, alkalinity and pH that have equal supersaturation (that is, equal propensity to cause calcium carbonate precipitation):

Ω = 1 (dissolution of aragonite takes place at all lower values of these parameters)
pH = 7.7

pH = 8.2
Calcium = 410 ppm

Calcium = 340 ppm
Alkalinity = 2.5 meq/L

Alkalinity = 1.0 meq/L

Ω = 3 (typical of normal seawater)
pH = 8.2

pH = 8.0

pH = 8.4
Calcium = 410 ppm

Calcium = 410 ppm

Calcium = 260 ppm
Alkalinity = 2.5 meq/L

Alkalinity = 4.0 meq/L

Alkalinity = 2.5 meq/L

Ω = 6 (non-biological precipitation is more likely)
pH = 8.2

pH = 8.2
Calcium = 410 ppm

Calcium = 820 ppm
Alkalinity = 5.0 meq/L

Alkalinity = 2.5 meq/L



pH = 8.0

pH = 8.7
Calcium = 410 ppm

Calcium = 410 ppm
Alkalinity = 8.0 meq/L

Alkalinity = 2.5 meq/L



pH = 8.45
Calcium = 410 ppm
Alkalinity = 4.2 meq/L

How should we think about supersaturation? The higher it is, the more likely it is that calcium carbonate will precipitate. The reason for this is straightforward: if the "pressure" to precipitate calcium carbonate becomes too high, certain inhibiting processes (described below) will be overwhelmed, and precipitation will take place.


If Ω is not too high, some precipitation will take place before the inhibiting mechanisms take control of the crystals' surface and prevent further precipitation. This is the process that happens in normal seawater. If Ω is too high, a bigger precipitation event can take place before being halted. In the worst cases, this can lead to a snowstorm of calcium carbonate particulates throughout the tank. Such snowstorms can occur, for example, when too much limewater is added to the tank. In that case, the pH rises and converts much of the bicarbonate to carbonate. Ω is then driven to unstable levels, and a massive precipitation event takes place.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.