![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() well said man
![]()
__________________
........ |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() ![]() Please excuse my ignorance or stupidity with this as I've read Albert's post a few times. Sump vs DT - basically flow to push the water through the rock? (obviously over simplifying the entire explanation) And, Brad, you have 100#'s in what size tank? Next question is then do I need 150 #'s in the 180? Last edited by Coralgurl; 09-21-2012 at 07:29 PM. |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
No, I have that in a 180. So I would use anywhere from 90ish to 120, depending on porosity, shapes, etc.
__________________
Brad |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The long and the short of it is if you have zero NH4, adding more rock to your sump will not improve your biological capacity. The rest of it was just a roundabout way or proving that bacterial populations have a limiting factor.
__________________
This and that. |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() First part of my statement was just saying I didn't completely understand Albert's explanation and how it tied in to the original question of relocating the rock to the sump that is currently in my DT.
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I think the point is that no, there is no advantage, and in fact could be detrimental to add the rock to your sump. You likely won't need it (assuming you add the 100ish pounds to the DT) and it could collect detritus, causing nutrient buildup.
__________________
Brad |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]()
__________________
Though a tree grow ever so high, the falling leaves return to the root. 300DD - 140DD ![]() TOTM Fall 2013 |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Cyano looks like its clearing up! Might be able to do this tomorrow instead of Sunday! ![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Not just that, it is a detriment for completely different reasons (detritus build up).
__________________
This and that. |
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Going to find some inspiration now! |