![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() possibly that re-netting the fish can double the risk of entangling its spines,which would double the risk of stabbing yourself untangling the spines
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Any fish can be a vector for disease. That in and of itself is more than enough to warrant quarantine of any fish imo.
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I've quarantined a foxface before, it survived and so did I
![]() |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() My One Spot gave me no grief during netting
When Smudge came home, I used one net and a reef glove to transfer him into the QT as he was freakin' out a bit When the observation period was over, I used 2 nets to get him into a small bucket for the DT transfer, and covered the bucket with a towel while dripping. This made him very docile I used only one net to transfer him to the DT as he was very sedate by then |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I bought my one-spot from a fellow reefer about 2 years ago. After slow dripping him for an hour I attempted to net him to place him in the display. Damn thing freaked out and got its spines tangled in the net. Quite an ordeal to get him out and he untangled himself and I didn't get tagged.
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Thanks for the feedback, folks.
I do believe I made the right choice in QTing him. I just wish wetwebmedia was a little more clear. Not QTing seems like too big a risk. The benefits of QT go beyond avoiding the transmission of disease. It gives one the opportunity to get the fish eating. This guy is not eating what I expected him too. I was told "brine and mysis, but you might be able to get I'm trained on pellets." As it turns out, he gobbles up Spectrum small fish pellets, but isn't overly interested in brine and mysis. It took me three days to figure that out. In the display system, there is so much voracious competition when it comes to food, it would have been harder to figure out. |