Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-13-2004, 09:56 PM
Old Guy Old Guy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 226
Old Guy is on a distinguished road
Default

As I only have 1 250watt halide with two 95 vho on the 36' tank compared to having 2 250's and 2 110 vho for a 4 foot tank. I think the 3 ft wins on cost there. To buy and to run.


It really depends on the final go. If your leaning to a sps tank, dual halides would be needed in any case. If the lean is towards the fish route, a work horse 7 will run 4 40w NO just fine on a 4 ft.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-13-2004, 10:13 PM
smokinreefer's Avatar
smokinreefer smokinreefer is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: burnaby,bc,canada
Posts: 1,441
smokinreefer is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to smokinreefer
Default

if you are considering a 4' tank...
why not go with a 75? best of both worlds!
as long as you can afford the initial set up cost.

otherwise i would go 58.

the 12" front to back of the 55 makes aquascaping a bit tough.
__________________
- S H A O -
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-13-2004, 10:26 PM
Bob I's Avatar
Bob I Bob I is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 3,591
Bob I is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Guy
As I only have 1 250watt halide with two 95 vho on the 36' tank compared to having 2 250's and 2 110 vho for a 4 foot tank. I think the 3 ft wins on cost there. To buy and to run.
That is the big dividing line is it not You don't need SPS to have a very good reef tank. I myself have a 2x96W PC fixture on my 50. There is not a SPS coral to be found in there except for a small M. digitata clump. The rest is softies, LPS. zoanthids, and mushrooms including Ricordia. For me that is all I want, and it makes me happy. I am sure the costs would increase dramatically if I were to add SPS to this mixture.
__________________
Bob
-----------------------------------------------------
To be loved you have to be nice to people every day - To be hated you don't have to do squat.

---------Homer Simpson--------
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-13-2004, 11:39 PM
Skimmerking's Avatar
Skimmerking Skimmerking is offline
acanthastrea freak
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Virden, Manitoba
Posts: 5,690
Skimmerking is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Skimmerking Send a message via MSN to Skimmerking
Default

it all comes down to money, I would go with a 74 that is 36 and or a 58 that is 36 easier to light and i you have only the 1 mh then do it , I like the deeper tanks that is good for the fish but a narrow tank is also good for the corals

personnel preferance..

Mike
__________________
180 starfire front, LPS, millipora
Doesn't matter how much you have been reading until you take the plunge.
You don't know as much as you think.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-14-2004, 12:55 AM
PrairieReefer PrairieReefer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lloydminster, Alberta
Posts: 61
PrairieReefer is on a distinguished road
Default

I was running a 25g that was 12in depth. If you are selective in your fish choices there is no problem that way, but I found it a nightmare to aquascape. By the time I got my rockwork arranged, there were spots I couldn't get my cleaner magnet between the rock and the front glass.

That tank was only 30in wide and I didn't think one MH covered it properly. It worked out ok though, as I had the MH to one side lighting my clams, and the dimmer side was good for lower light softies.

I vote for the 36in tank, or better yet a 75g like was mentioned previously (which is what I did)

Marcel
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-14-2004, 02:42 AM
Quinn Quinn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 2,305
Quinn is on a distinguished road
Default

I vote 36"
__________________
-Quinn

Man, n. ...His chief occupation is extermination of other animals and his own species, which, however, multiplies with such insistent rapidity as to infest the whole habitable earth, and Canada. - A. Bierce, Devil's Dictionary, 1906
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-14-2004, 02:51 AM
Maverick's Avatar
Maverick Maverick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Regina
Posts: 42
Maverick is on a distinguished road
Default 55 or 58

One thing that seems to comes up is drilled for overflow ? Neither one is that I know of. I am going to check tomorrow to see if one can be ordered for the same price .

Should I check into that ?

Maverick
__________________
\" Your just jealous because the voices only talk to me !\"
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-14-2004, 04:22 AM
christyf5's Avatar
christyf5 christyf5 is offline
Staff
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Nanaimo
Posts: 9,175
christyf5 is on a distinguished road
Default

Definitely, drilled is easier IMO.
__________________
Christy's Reef Blog

My 180 Build

Every electronic component is shipped with smoke stored deep inside.... only a real genius can find a way to set it free.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-14-2004, 05:42 AM
trilinearmipmap trilinearmipmap is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Prince Rupert B.C.
Posts: 1,213
trilinearmipmap is on a distinguished road
Default

A 58 has no centre brace which is nice.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-14-2004, 12:44 PM
martym's Avatar
martym martym is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Surrey,Bc
Posts: 578
martym is on a distinguished road
Default

I had a a 55 long, it is so narrow you can't do much aquasaping. i didn't like it. JMO
__________________
Marty
50g reef, bubble king skimmer,20g sump,zeovit system, PM cal reactor
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.