![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
As for improved surface skimming, you may be right but 20" is pretty big already. I good alternative if this is what you're looking for is take design 1 and increase the length of the overflow and move the return lines into the overflow like design 2, then you accomplish both your goals. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Do you mean extend them, but not all the way to the ends? I'm going to have a tee and an elbow in there for each of the three drains, so I have to make sure there is enough room.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I like #1
In #2 If your return is under water like that you will need to also figure out a way to stop the syphon when the pump shuts off
__________________
250G DD LED SPS R.I.P. 180G LED SPS 80"x36". 300G custom build Owner of Mountain Ridge Heating and Gas Class A gas fitter, HVAC |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I would use a lockline to move it to the surface. It will be higher than the water level (or right at it)
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I like #2 better. Technically it should be stronger since you don't have a corner cut into the glass that will be a stress point(even though there's very little stress with 1" of water). Lots of people with #1 though that works great for them.
Love the size of both though, very wide. Will make a great reef.
__________________
My 150 In Wall Build |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() i like design #1. only cause its pretty much exactly what i have. you can see pics in concept's thread (pics 11 and 12). it is 60x30x24h
http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=82418 |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Numero Uno
__________________
I'm not 'fallow' you must be talking about my tank! |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Also when I say front and sides, I calling the pane with overflow the side and 5x2 pane the front. Last edited by sphelps; 03-03-2012 at 04:52 PM. |
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I am going to throw a problem in here. design 1 has two inside 90 degree corners in the back pain, which are inherent stress points in cut glass. so in-fact tank 1 could actually be weaker on the back.
as for looks tank 2 will look much cleaner from the front and a coast to coast overflow is nice for a few reasons, better surface skimming and also because of the extra length it has more volume. the only issue I have is how are you doing your returns in number 2 my vote is for design 2 Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() #2 for me. All you have to do is have your everflow notch for the returns and use lock line. that's what I did. My returns are drilled in the bottom and they come up, then bend into the tank under water. I even have acrylic on top to finish off the look.
Here's a pic. ![]() ![]() |