Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-19-2012, 11:26 PM
Proteus's Avatar
Proteus Proteus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,784
Proteus is on a distinguished road
Default

http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2008-08/nftt/index.php

Above is the artical I had read.

I have started running gfo a month ago and have been dosing 2 weeks now at a current level of 2ml a day in a 240g system.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-19-2012, 11:43 PM
ScubaSteve ScubaSteve is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,591
ScubaSteve is on a distinguished road
Default

Yes, I've read that article too.. but I kinda disagree with his comments on GFO being unnecessary.

Bacterial removal of nutrients is no new thing; it's actually fairly common practice in water treatment (one of my fields of research). The thing is, if you break down the chemical equation for nutrient conversion to biomass (how much mass of nutrient becomes mass of bacteria), phosphates are removed much slower rate than nitrates (at least for the bacteria we commonly see in our tanks). So your bacteria driven system will most likely be carbon and nitrate limited rather than phosphate limited, meaning you will have an excess of phosphates (though your phospahte level WIL go down); it helps to have GFO or something similar to handle the rest.

That being said, if your have a TON of GFO and are removing phosphates very aggressively, you will make the bacteria driven system phosphate limited and it does become counter productive. This situation is not as likely as the first.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-19-2012, 11:52 PM
George George is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Coquitlam,BC
Posts: 527
George is on a distinguished road
Default

In theory, GFO can absorb all of phosphate in your tank eventually (if you change your GFO frequently). At the same time, the bacterial triggered by carbon dosing also needs both nitrate and phosphate with some ratio (some say 16:1, but I think different strains of bacterial take those 2 in different ratio. Anyhow they always take more NO3 than PO4). If you tank is running out of PO4, carbon dosing won't do you any good.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-20-2012, 12:52 AM
Proteus's Avatar
Proteus Proteus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,784
Proteus is on a distinguished road
Default

Lol. I have no shortage of phosphates

I ask as I stupidly overfed my tank. My wife was feeding while I was at work and I was feeding in evening. Not knowing that she was doing so. Or that she was doing so twice a day. I was feeding in evening. Since I have a shy Cbb which doesn't care for Mh lights so I fed when just t5 were on. I first notice when I spotted HA. and had a stag loose a little flesh. Then with a spike in po4 I changed gfo and decided to try carbon dosing. I also have a refuge with mangroves and Cheto. Though Cheto doesnt want to grow
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.