Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-16-2012, 06:58 PM
doch's Avatar
doch doch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort McMurray
Posts: 649
doch is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reefwars View Post
if its coral specific say all your sps and not your lps then i would lean towards the angel as well if its not chem.
Yes, it is only the SPS. All of my zoas (except for a melted CAR frag... damnit) are looking really good. LPS... really good. Clams... better than ever. As for the chemistry, I'll have to run the test gauntlet soon, but like I had mentioned, the frag tank looks great which eliminates this as a possibility in my head. Last time I checked, all parameters were right around where I want them... Ca ~400, dKh ~7 Mg ~1250-1300 (I know, a little low) PO4 0.01-0.05, no measurable nitrates, nitrites or amonia. I'm running GFO, and Carbon 24/7... and full Zeo.
__________________
-Murdoch

160 gallon Reef, almost all SPS, a few LPS, small handfull of Zoas, and 5 clams. LOVING the upgrade (now that most of the work is done!)

My tank Journal: http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=75924
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-16-2012, 07:00 PM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

If it was a chemistry issue, it would be both tanks. Your numbers look fine.
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-16-2012, 07:03 PM
reefwars reefwars is offline
R.I.P.
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 6,186
reefwars will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquattro View Post
If it was a chemistry issue, it would be both tanks. Your numbers look fine.


agreed chem is fine, since its only sps and its on the tips, and the same frags are doing fine in the FT ....hate to say but you got a angel with a taste hehepp
__________________
........
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-16-2012, 07:34 PM
shootingstar shootingstar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Thunder Bay ON
Posts: 110
shootingstar is on a distinguished road
Default

I am running the Sol Blues and like most ramped them up over time.
But I only made adjustments (either 5% or add 30 min to a cycle) every 7 to 10 day increments. Perhaps the 2-3 day period was just a little too fast for them to adjust.

Even now at 5 months in I am not over 80% and that peak setting probably only for about 3 hours per day.

I'm at 12" above so far as well.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-16-2012, 07:45 PM
ScubaSteve ScubaSteve is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,591
ScubaSteve is on a distinguished road
Default

Are you running ULNS?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-16-2012, 08:40 PM
doch's Avatar
doch doch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort McMurray
Posts: 649
doch is on a distinguished road
Default

Yes, full Zeovit.
__________________
-Murdoch

160 gallon Reef, almost all SPS, a few LPS, small handfull of Zoas, and 5 clams. LOVING the upgrade (now that most of the work is done!)

My tank Journal: http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=75924
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-16-2012, 08:59 PM
ScubaSteve ScubaSteve is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,591
ScubaSteve is on a distinguished road
Default

Ok, this is just my opinion here, so take it with a grain of salt...

ULNS keep corals "trim and fit" to keep those nice colours, meaning they have little "fat" (aka excess zooxanthellae) to help them ride out system disturbances. With ULNS, we are essentially keeping them on the knife's edge. This is why so many people in the beginning of biopellets were having recession problems: the corals were starving.

The dramatic change in lighting conditions (not just intensity, but spectrum) probably caused the SPS to freak out a little while adjusting. You didn't spike the lighting, so it's not shock, but being at the intensity you are now they might not have enough zooxanthellae or pigmentation to handle the increased photons rates. This can cause photoinhibition (meaning too much light is causing them to shut down) or they're heating up at the skeletons due to the lack of skin pigmentation (ie. coral sunscreen). This can (and does) happen when you swap to new bulbs, new fixtures, etc. The change in intensity from T5 to LED is probably what triggered it. Corals that aren't pushed to the limit by ULNS can usually ride this out without ill effect.

Also, a shift in spectrum (LEDs are narrow spectrum compared to halides and T5) can cause a shift in which zooxanthellae clade is dominant in the coral. Each clade has it's own specific absorption spectrum; if you switch to a different lighting spectrum, you can have a shift in clades as one is no longer being favoured over the other. This transition period might cause issues as there is a change over between the dominant algaes (ie. dominant food source).

If you are seeing basal STN, that signals to me starvation which makes me think the above. Try turning down the lights a little bit and feed a bit more. Try amino acids if you haven't already; I have found them to be particularly good at fighting STN.

Last edited by ScubaSteve; 01-16-2012 at 09:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.