Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > DIY

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-11-2004, 04:54 AM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

If there is something like that, my guess is it's minimal or negligible. Of all the stats/specs I read about ballasts, they all more or less have the same "wattage" (which is roughly amps times voltage, give or take) regardless of what input voltage is used.

Thus I'm not real sure that it's a "benefit" nor a "deteriment" to run them off 220. Like powerboy said, it's half the amps, but it's twice the voltage. Six of one, half-dozen of the other? I guess it's more a matter of whatever's convenient. If you have to run some new circuits/wiring/breakers anyways, you might as well just do the one for 110 and be done.

But, on the other hand, .... the wiring for 220 is presumably going to be heavier guage and thus there ought to be less resistance in the wiring. Therefore it might be conceivable that there is some slight gain in efficiency (rather, a reduction of loss, or something like that), but I can't imagine if that really translates into a noticeable reduction in your power consumption... I have no idea.
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.