![]() |
|
View Poll Results: 72" Aquatinics Constellation good enough for SPS? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 52.00% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 8.00% |
Go with the Aquatinics Constellation |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 12.00% |
Go with 2 X 36" Metal Halide Fixtures |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 28.00% |
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I have a 72" constellation on my 500g 36" deep tank (its for sale BTW) and it worked great on my system, I had a mixed reef with a great collection of SPS, softies, and clams & chalices on the sandbed and had better growth rates than when I had 4-400w lighting it. I think it worked great
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I have always been a big fan of t5's, and I ran them on my last tank with a depth of 24 inches and a full sps tank with many of the so called difficult sps doing just fine. Of course the lower heat coming from t5's was also a bonus.
__________________
RSM 250. Clownfish, Fox face, Blue tang, Yellow tang, Kole tang, Clown tang, Coral beauty angel, French Angel, splendid dottyback. CUC, softies, lps, sps. |