![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() is kind of silly, but the idea of moving the tank around hmm.. that would be much easier......
![]() as for sleeping fish if the rocks move as one thats no problem as they are inside the moving mass and it would be the same to them as an alternating current. actualy there are several natural habatats that would act the same way. but way to expensive to be practical. Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() He was just brainstorming I think. Like he said there he is open to critics and as to why it would or wouldn't work.
Just like someone said here the best creations come from the most ubsurd ideas. One I could think of is the horseless carriage. Everyone thought ford was crazy to think that a carriage can run without a horse, yet we are all ride one everyday. |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Who thought Ford was crazy? If I was riding a horse and someone showed me a combustible engine, I would call that a good idea......it was a welcome and useful invention.
Now show me some plotter or robotics to move rocks in water and I have to ask why? What is the usefulness or benefit....if an invention is not useful or improves something what is the point. |