Banded cat shark

[Wayne]

Big Al's had Sharks in a 2000G aquarium. I realise that Live Aquaria suggests a minimum of a 180 but I really think you should be somewhere closer to 500G IMO (about 6'W x 6'L x 2'H)

You should talk with Ken at Blue World I know he has one (not sure if its for sale) and he can get them. At least get the education so you know what you are in for.

[Flash]

Our shark at blue world won't be going to any tank under 200gl.. Aiming for 400gl. They get 3.5-4 feet. I know I won't sell him to just anyone. I am sure Ken will back me up on that.

[triggereef]

+1 bean
totally agreed. This shark has grown considerably since he was born and should not be placed in a tank under 200g even though many websites will beg to differ. It also has to be big enough for the shark to be able to turn around in the tank, so a square tank would be best. as well perfect tank conditions should be taken into consideration.

Taylor.

[Funky_Fish14]

Just for the record, that tank at big al's is NOT 2000gal. It is 1346gal. I went in and measured it personally one time. Tank is 10x6x3tall.

A fish 3ft long really should be in a way bigger tank than even 4 or 500 gallons.

First of all the obvious, the bigger the tank, the better. AT LEAST three times the length and twice the width of the maximum size of the species you have in mind...

This quote was taken from an article on wetwebmedia.com and written by Bob Fenner and is well supported with references. This is probably the mimimum reccomendation I have ever seen for swimming space too. I remember in one 'coral' magazine (or maybe tropical fish hobbyiest?) they suggest 5x the length x 3x the width. The fish just will not do well without the swimming room, or live to their full potential.

Article link:
http://www.wetwebmedia.com/sharks.htm

Cheers,

Chris

[Wayne]

Originally Posted by Funky_Fish14

Just for the record, that tank at big al's is NOT 2000gal. It is 1346gal. I went in and measured it personally one time. Tank is 10x6x3tall. Chris

Oops my bad I can honestly say I have never measured their tank

[Funky_Fish14]

Originally Posted by Wayne

Oops my bad I can honestly say I have never measured their tank

Haha nono, no worries at all! I capitalized 'not' because im sick of big al's claiming that. I knew it wasnt that big when I saw it and after estimating a few times I was thinking what the heck, it cant be that much smaller than they claim... so I had to measure it.

[Wayne]

LOL they are only 700 gallons off

[Funky_Fish14]

Thats like taking a 180, cutting 2 or 2.5ft off it, and still calling it a 180!

[gzsick]

While I appreciate everyone's help/concern, keep one thing in mind, I didn't get into the hobby yesterday, when i said 180 gallons or larger, I meant 180 is the min. size, and i only said that part because i don't wanna have a bunch of replies on what their husbandry requirements are (like i did get). I used to work at a public aquarium and i know a thing or two. Next time, please listen more carefully to my question, i just wanna know if anyone has one....nothing else. FYI, I will not reconsider buying it and they get 3.5 ft not 4 ft. oh and it's one of the smallest common sharks, not THE smallest one, there's one that maxes out at 27 inches.
Thanks

[paddyob]

Really? Which one?

A lot if people make claims. I never trust a "self appointed" expert.

If you are so knowledgable why have you not just approached one of our city's well known shops... As any knowledgable reefer would do when looking for something that special?