![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]() Adam, I have had my eos for a while no and still have no bought any other lense for it as while ther world of DLSR is great, the price of the lense is not. what I will sugest is you go into a camera shop and look for 58mm closeup lense's they should run about 15.00 to 30.00 bucks each and range from +2 to +10. with these you don't get realy close they just kinda zoom the subject for ya. these are what I used when I took most of my pictures years ago with my fuji. I still have a tone of filters but my fuji is a 52mm mount where our cannons are a 58mm mount. the 600 to 1000 buck macro lense does do a better job but for internet posting and normal pictures you won't notice the difference. Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Not spending much is all relative. I wouldn't buy a used lens without personal inspection and use on my camera for testing first. Look at sigma 50mm F2.8. At around 400 bucks brand new its a great buy and a great lens for lots of things too. And being a FF lens it will be more like 80mm which is a great focal length. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() For the Canon camera, I would suggest the same as sweet ride, to go with the 100mm f2.8 usm macro lense.
I bought mine used off of ebay for $400 shipping included and I am super happy with it. I don't have near the photography skills as sweet ride, but the type of shots you can take with it are just amazing. Here are a few of mine. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The little 58mm screw on macro lenses +2 - +10 work more like a magnifying glass and while you can get a little close up, you don't get nearly the depth of field nor the clarity a true macro lense gives you. I tried them. You can get them for around $15 on ebay. I have also heard great things about the sigma 150mm f2.8 macro lense though I have never used it. Also might I suggest when you do get a good macro lense, to get a tripod and a remote shutter as this will greatly reduce camera shake making your pictures much sharper.
__________________
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I would look for a used 100mm or 65mm macro to save money. Any macro lens will produce similar results provided you can get close enough for the 1:1 focusing distance. The lower the mm the closer you'll have get to the subject.
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Here are a few pics taken with 100mm macro ![]() ![]() and a few pics taken with the kit lens. ![]() ![]() |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() To heck with the lens, where can someone buy white balance
![]()
__________________
Brad |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() have both canon 100 and a sigma, the sigma is a good choice to save some bucks (I think it was about a 400 or so difference between my two).
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() So what kind of a lens would you need to take close ups like that of corals that are near the back of say a 24" tank?
__________________
![]() |
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Brad |
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
the lens i use for all my macro shots is the sigma 150mm f2.8 which is a $1000+ lens. With the new canon 100mm f2.8 "L" lens out the older 100mm f2.8 non L is a steal for performance you can generally find them at roughly $400-500 |