Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

View Poll Results: How much rock?
Use less than the recommended amount 15 29.41%
Use the recommended amount 13 25.49%
Have no idea, I just added rock to get a certain look 23 45.10%
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-13-2010, 10:24 PM
Reefer Rob's Avatar
Reefer Rob Reefer Rob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 997
Reefer Rob is on a distinguished road
Default

1.5 lbs per gal would be OK if you could set it up in a sump. Way too much rock in the display for my taste .
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-13-2010, 10:36 PM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Rest In Peace
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kamloops BC
Posts: 4,920
Doug has disabled reputation
Default

Just to be different, I like lots of rock. Never been an "open" look fan. I love full reef tanks. More rock, better filtration, just need to make sure enough water movement and placement to allow for such. I can say for a fact, most fish we keep, including the cruising tangs, love lots of rock and hidey places. Anyways, just a different opinion to the mix.
__________________
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-13-2010, 10:53 PM
reefwars reefwars is offline
R.I.P.
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 6,186
reefwars will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug View Post
Just to be different, I like lots of rock. Never been an "open" look fan. I love full reef tanks. More rock, better filtration, just need to make sure enough water movement and placement to allow for such. I can say for a fact, most fish we keep, including the cruising tangs, love lots of rock and hidey places. Anyways, just a different opinion to the mix.



I'm with ya Doug lol lots of rock here more the beter lol
__________________
........
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-13-2010, 10:58 PM
lorenz0's Avatar
lorenz0 lorenz0 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: calgary
Posts: 1,317
lorenz0 is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm probably at 0.8/Gal for both tanks
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-13-2010, 11:02 PM
Lance's Avatar
Lance Lance is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Powell River, B.C.
Posts: 3,572
Lance is on a distinguished road
Default

I don't pay much attention to how much rock I use. i just 'scape it 'til I like it. Probably about 1 lb per.
__________________
225g reef
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-13-2010, 11:23 PM
bignose's Avatar
bignose bignose is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 943
bignose is on a distinguished road
Default

I scaped my tank to how I like it which is less that the pound per gallon. But I filled one of my sump chambers with rock. I don't know how much I have in the tank but it probably worked out to the "pound per gallon rule".
__________________
My old tank journal
90G sps reef
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-14-2010, 03:47 AM
Dez's Avatar
Dez Dez is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,793
Dez is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lance View Post
I don't pay much attention to how much rock I use. i just 'scape it 'til I like it. Probably about 1 lb per.
I'm with Lance on this one. I probably only have about 100lbs of rock with about 340 gallons of water volume. That's about 0.3 lbs per gallon... hmmm, I must not have enough filtration. And I have over 30 fish and tons of coral. Oops.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-14-2010, 04:04 AM
Coleus Coleus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Calgary NW
Posts: 1,179
Coleus is on a distinguished road
Default

i have like 200 lbs for my 150 gallon tank and i hate it. going to redo the tank once i have time
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-14-2010, 04:15 AM
daniella3d's Avatar
daniella3d daniella3d is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: longueuil, quebec
Posts: 1,979
daniella3d is on a distinguished road
Default

I use about 40 lbs or so in a 75 gallons but it work great because it's the totoka liverock and it is extremely porous. Not only that but the total amout of surface a small piece of Totoka give is equivalent to a much heavier and larger piece of regular liverock. Because Totoka liverock has a lot of branching, it has a lot more amount of useful surface area.

So I guessed the 40 lbs of Totoka was probably equivalent to 80 lbs of heavy rock shaped liverock with very little surface. Worked great for me as my nitrates are undetectible and the rock seem to be doing a good job at filtration and denitrification.

It's not the quantity that really matter but the quality of the rock you put in there I think.

Last edited by daniella3d; 12-14-2010 at 04:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-13-2010, 11:30 PM
fishytime's Avatar
fishytime fishytime is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: E-town
Posts: 5,390
fishytime will become famous soon enough
Default

2lbs/g ish...........110g display not to full looking with probably 100 lbs.....sump STUFF-ED with probably close to another 100 lbs.......the more the better....
__________________
260g mixed reef, 105g sump, water blaster 7000 return, Bubble King SM 300 skimmer, Aqua Controller Jr, 4 radions, 3 Tunze 6055s,1 tunze 6065, 2 Vortech MP40s, Vortech MP20, Tunze ATO, GHL SA2 doser, 2 TLF reactors (1 carbon, 1 rowa). http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=50034 . Tank Video here http://www.vimeo.com/2304609 and here http://www.vimeo.com/16591694
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.