![]() |
|
View Poll Results: How much rock? | |||
Use less than the recommended amount |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 29.41% |
Use the recommended amount |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 25.49% |
Have no idea, I just added rock to get a certain look |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
23 | 45.10% |
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I think I have about 0.5lbs per gallon in both my reef tanks. I much prefer to have more open space for swimming. Seems to be enough filtration.
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Ya, I just rockscaped the 180, and figure I might have 100 pounds...I prefer more open space. Not sure what it looks like yet, I added 4 bags of sand too, and I have a tank of milk. It felt good going in, maybe tomorrow I'll get to see it
![]()
__________________
Brad |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I personally find the "pounds per gallon" rule as useful as the "watts per gallon" rule
![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The old school thought is 1 pound per gallon of mixed salt water in your tank and not the total capacity of your tank and sump. so a 100g tank would get about 85-90 pounds of rock. you can have more but less if you are going to heavily stock is frond upon, as the rock will not be able to keep up with the bio load demand.
Bill |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I think surface area is probably the more meaningful metric so while you're waiting for the water to clear, measure the volume of your rock using the Archimedes principle and then measure the surface area of said rock and let us all know the results. The method for measuring surface area is left as an exercise to the reader. Bonus points if you somehow use a laser. Extra bonus points if you use a blue laser. http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/lights/896a/
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Less then what is recommended. Believe I have about 80LBS in my 105G. I like the more open space look.
Chris |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() 1.5 lbs per gal would be OK if you could set it up in a sump. Way too much rock in the display for my taste .
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Just to be different, I like lots of rock. Never been an "open" look fan. I love full reef tanks. More rock, better filtration, just need to make sure enough water movement and placement to allow for such. I can say for a fact, most fish we keep, including the cruising tangs, love lots of rock and hidey places. Anyways, just a different opinion to the mix.
![]()
__________________
Doug |
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I'm probably at 0.8/Gal for both tanks
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() 2lbs/g ish......
![]()
__________________
260g mixed reef, 105g sump, water blaster 7000 return, Bubble King SM 300 skimmer, Aqua Controller Jr, 4 radions, 3 Tunze 6055s,1 tunze 6065, 2 Vortech MP40s, Vortech MP20, Tunze ATO, GHL SA2 doser, 2 TLF reactors (1 carbon, 1 rowa). http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=50034 . Tank Video here http://www.vimeo.com/2304609 and here http://www.vimeo.com/16591694 |