Thoughts

[Milad]

Originally Posted by kien

The 415 is like a mini ocean!! I wouldn't ever set one up tho personally . Larger tank means larger more expensive equipment and upkeep, especially if it is a reef. If you can swing it awesome I say go big!

i beg to differ on that. I think there is a fine balance.

I just got a 14g nano to house some clowns and I swear that thing is so annoying compared to my 180g. For a water change i split water everywhere and **** got messed up and all kinds of stuff.

the 180 i can do a water change in like 5min while having tea, no spills

i think there is a point where it can be too large but i dont think 415 would be too large. would be fun!

[Delphinus]

That's quite a choice. Both tanks are pretty nice, but they're hardly comparable. It's like asking if you'd rather have a really big camper or a ... um .. I'm stuck on a metaphor here .. a ferry. Seems to me it depends on what fits the space, budget, energy level for maintenance, etc. .. and what's going into it.

[kien]

Originally Posted by Milad

i beg to differ on that. I think there is a fine balance.

I just got a 14g nano to house some clowns and I swear that thing is so annoying compared to my 180g. For a water change i split water everywhere and **** got messed up and all kinds of stuff.

the 180 i can do a water change in like 5min while having tea, no spills

i think there is a point where it can be too large but i dont think 415 would be too large. would be fun!

You don't have to "beg" to differ

can't you just scoop out 1.4 gallons and then dump back in 1.4 gallons for a 10% change on the nano? It would also seem to me that making up 10% water changes for a 14g wouldn't take as long or as much resources (time, money, salt, water, etc..) as the 180g.

[Milad]

Originally Posted by kien

You don't have to "beg" to differ

can't you just scoop out 1.4 gallons and then dump back in 1.4 gallons for a 10% change on the nano? It would also seem to me that making up 10% water changes for a 14g wouldn't take as long or as much resources (time, money, salt, water, etc..) as the 180g.

nano doesnt have a skimmer so i do ~3-4g water change
taking it out takes longer than my setup on the 180g
and its also messy because i dropped the hose and it went everywhere.

then when i poured the water back in, all kinds of stuff got knocked over

the 180g i just flip a switch on the computer and drink my tea, flip another switch, drink some more tea, then play some starcraft while fresh water is being added for new sw mix.
i guess i just setup the 180g better than the nano. I even have to top off the nano because it doesnt have a ATO yet.

funny part is im going to make it easier to do the water changes soon because i want it done in under 5min and i want to be able to do it remotely just in case.

anyways, my vote is 415 kien is 250
and I would suggest to go peninsula (or 4 side viewable) for the added fun since you already got a bunch of tanks that im assuming are standard viewable. you gota challenge yourself!

[reefcanada]

The place this tank would go, is 81" wide and the tank would slide in there perfect. I am not a fan of tanks viewable from more than two sides. Just my preference.

One thing that concerns me about this build is getting the closed loop intake so that my nems. don't crawl into it.

[Milad]

Originally Posted by reefcanada

The place this tank would go, is 81" wide and the tank would slide in there perfect. I am not a fan of tanks viewable from more than two sides. Just my preference.

One thing that concerns me about this build is getting the closed loop intake so that my nems. don't crawl into it.

but then you are missing half of the excitement in your tank!

[reefcanada]

Originally Posted by Milad

but then you are missing half of the excitement in your tank!

I will only have about 150 lbs of rock in this tank, so the fish should always be out.