![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I like the 250 idea better , I personally like a long tank thats narrow seems like more swim room and I like to look at my corals up close
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
you have extra 415 laying around? ill take it
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
If you've got the room and the wallet go for the big fella. 60" deep is awesome! Aquascaping heaven!
__________________
225g reef |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
i would setup the 415 btw, i setup my 180 and I wish I went bigger. something like 600g
8x4x2. but i do like that one piece euro, thats sick. what are the notches for on the sides? |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
The notches are for my power head cords, if I was to need them. This way they just slide over the ends and not over the eurobrace and over.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Split the intakes a few times, less suction same flow.
If it was reef I'd go with the 250 even if the 80x60 footprint fits. Particularly if you're not going with 3 or 4 sided viewing, really the only thing you're getting further is lots of ravine possibilities. Unless you're really into ravines ... Unless you really need the extra volume for big fish. That would make an awesome FOWLR tank. IMHO.
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I don't think you need my opinion after recent discussion Jay =) You gotta go with the bigger one! But I'd certainly take a couple tanks down at the same time lol. 60" front to back would be so bangin'!
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
The 415 is like a mini ocean!! I wouldn't ever set one up tho personally
. Larger tank means larger more expensive equipment and upkeep, especially if it is a reef. If you can swing it awesome I say go big! |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would replace my softie reef, so the cost would not be that great and I have most of the gear already.
|