Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-26-2010, 01:52 PM
chris88 chris88 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fort McMurray
Posts: 414
chris88 is on a distinguished road
Default

You can't really compare Nm to kelvin. Red is from 650-700nm but that doesn’t correlate to a Kelvin tempter. A lower Kelvin light will have more red in its spectrum but that doesn't mean the bulb is going to look red. Just like a 10,000k bulb has a lot of green light, it doesn’t mean the bulb looks green. A 2,700k bulb will have a warm oranage-ish yellow hue almost like a candle light, while a 20,000k barely has any red spectrum in it and is predominantly blue. Most mid range bulbs have spikes in different spectrums which makes the color look white because of the way they blend. (6,500k – 14,000k)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-26-2010, 01:57 PM
MrGoodbytes's Avatar
MrGoodbytes MrGoodbytes is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 78
MrGoodbytes is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to MrGoodbytes
Default

Hmm interesting. I looked into it further with respect to fluorescent lamps in particular and it turns out to be quite a bit more complicated to determine actual correlated colour temperature (CCT). They use CCT to distinguish between actual CT since our lamps aren't actually radiating at that temperature.

You can use Wien's Law to find the peak of the blackbody spectrum which that of the lamp resembles but the lamp's spectral distribution (intensity per unit wavelength) will be different, due to the phosphors. Nevertheless, it still produces light that looks similar to our eyes, which "add" colours. That's why a low CCT lamp may appear white-"ish" but have a peak in the red - the other colours are playing a part when we observe them altogether.

Bah, sorry if this is way off topic or anything. Hope this clears things up somewhat.

Graeme
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-26-2010, 03:06 PM
Myka's Avatar
Myka Myka is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Saskatoon, SK.
Posts: 11,268
Myka will become famous soon enough
Default

Graeme, it is still interesting information that's kinda on-topic. the bulbs we use are usually "rated" at a certain color temperature, but if you use a CT meter it will say the color is much different. I don't fully understand why we see it as a different CT than the meter does? Must have something to do with the spikes in the spectrum over-powering our eyes maybe...?

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris88 View Post
Just like a 10,000k bulb has a lot of green light, it doesn’t mean the bulb looks green. A 2,700k bulb will have a warm oranage-ish yellow hue almost like a candle light, while a 20,000k barely has any red spectrum in it and is predominantly blue. Most mid range bulbs have spikes in different spectrums...
That's why they are called "full spectrum". Some are "fuller" than others though. I think most people know that all the colors in the rainbow are in "white" light.
__________________
~ Mindy

SPS fanatic.

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-12-2010, 09:21 AM
RuGlu6 RuGlu6 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver PoMo
Posts: 829
RuGlu6 is on a distinguished road
Default

My T5 bulbs are 3+ years old. Replaced only when burnt out.
Have 6xTek T5.
My tank has almost non existent algae.
My SPS have VERY nice color and growth I have Pink, bright green, blue tip Dual Color SPS and green tip as well.
So go figure.

Low bio load (only 3 fish in 65 gal tank ), high ORP (with high air flow) air driven skimmer it is constant just over 450. Second skimmer is Deltek 600 HOB.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-12-2010, 01:55 PM
mark's Avatar
mark mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,212
mark is on a distinguished road
Default

Is it shift in temperature, 14K to 10K, don't see a problem as lots start with 10K bulbs, or they basically stay at 14K but with just a increased narrow spike at a lower wavelength.

(or just a conspiracy by the manufactures and supplier to replace our bulbs)
__________________
my tank
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-12-2010, 02:03 PM
daniella3d's Avatar
daniella3d daniella3d is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: longueuil, quebec
Posts: 1,979
daniella3d is on a distinguished road
Default

In deed. I have a fugi purple that is very red on my other tank and no algae grow. I used to have PC that were near a year old and no algae either.

I use GFO in both my aquarium + micro algae and not overcrawding and that does the trick.

We must not forget that zooxanthellae are algae and that coral need them to grown, at least for photosynthetic coral.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris88 View Post
The spectrum and intensity does change in various lighting bulbs but its not the major causes of an algae bloom. Algae will grow because there is an access of nutrients. You could put a ton of red over a tank will low nutrients and no algae will grow. In fact that’s what people are doing with the new fiji purple and ati purple plus bulbs, they are adding red spectrum. If you have excess algae growth you will have access nutrients (nitrates, phosphates, silica, etc). However, the added red and yellow spectrum will make a high nutrient tank grow algae much faster because algae use red spectrum very well for photosynthesis.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-12-2010, 02:05 PM
wickedfrags's Avatar
wickedfrags wickedfrags is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 1,319
wickedfrags is on a distinguished road
Default

No significant correlation between bulb age (or spectrum) and algae growth in my experience. Water quality (nutrient levels) dictates algae growth, not quantity or spectrum of light.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyler Werbowski View Post
I understand that older bulb lose intensity and there's a slight spectrum change. I've heard that old MH bulbs can be a contributing factor to unwanted algae growth. Could someone explain the theory behind algae growth?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-13-2010, 04:40 PM
Myka's Avatar
Myka Myka is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Saskatoon, SK.
Posts: 11,268
Myka will become famous soon enough
Default

If everything else is in order, the bulb age and spectrum will have no effect on algae. On a tank that already has an algae issue a change in bulbs and/or spectrum can really help. On a tank on the brink of an algae bloom aging bulbs can be the straw that broke the camel's back.

My tank is a very good example right now. One of my 20K halides burned out. I only have 10K as spares. So my reef has a 10K on the left side (with 6 months use on it) and a 20K on the right side (with 14 months use on it). On the left side a minor dusting of diatoms shows up in late afternoon under the 10K bulb, but not on the right under the 20K bulb. Also, you can see a difference that there is more to scrape off the front glass on the left than the right.
__________________
~ Mindy

SPS fanatic.

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-13-2010, 08:09 PM
chris88 chris88 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fort McMurray
Posts: 414
chris88 is on a distinguished road
Default

The shift in spectrum isn't the issue with old bulbs, it's the major drop in par. Its on average about a 30% drop in par after 6 months and sometimes a 50% drop after a year. This happens with t5's or halides. This isn't a debatable issue. There is a lot of data on the decrease in par so its a fact and not a conspiracy. I would not suggest running any type of bulb for longer then a year unless you are doing a fowlr tank. I change my t5's at about 9-10 months.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-13-2010, 10:48 PM
Myka's Avatar
Myka Myka is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Saskatoon, SK.
Posts: 11,268
Myka will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris88 View Post
The shift in spectrum isn't the issue with old bulbs, it's the major drop in par. Its on average about a 30% drop in par after 6 months and sometimes a 50% drop after a year. This happens with t5's or halides. This isn't a debatable issue. There is a lot of data on the decrease in par so its a fact and not a conspiracy. I would not suggest running any type of bulb for longer then a year unless you are doing a fowlr tank. I change my t5's at about 9-10 months.
It is a debatable issue because your numbers aren't right, but that's a different topic. Please explain how lower PAR affects algae growth...?
__________________
~ Mindy

SPS fanatic.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.