![]() |
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() This ancient thread from aquaria.ca seems to suggest you just twist the 4 red wires together and run the lights in series if you want 2x110 out of 2 lamps. Would the same principle apply to 8x24w? The lights might actually be overdriven slightly.
http://aquariacanada.com/forums/showthread.php?t=244 Argh, my head is swimming. ![]()
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Heres an additional thought on this subject; the ballast spec advises this ballast is only good for 4x54w bulbs. If you have a look around MOST ballast manufacturers have a specific ballast for 24w/39w t5s and seperate one for 54w and higher. I believe this has something to do with how much energy the bulb needs to start (think of what happens when you run a larger power compact on a ballast rated for smaller bulb, it just flickers but never fully fires) In this scenario the bulbs may recieve too much juice on start up and possible fizzle or just not start. I could be wrong but there has to be reason for this difference. WH5s are rated for the 2 foot bulbs you are looking run and they can only run a total of 4 bulbs, the Wh8s can run 6. Remember that a ballast can only start so many bulbs at once - this is also why you can not run 8 bulbs. A good example of this is the ICECAP 660 ballasts - they can run any combination of bulbs up to 16' in length as long as they DONT exceed 4 bulbs. Once again this relates to the amount of energy required to initially start the bulb. You said you were running three halides - is there room to instead run two four foot t5s in the front of your tank and two at the back? you would have better coverage that way too. Also your cost goes down significantly for 4 foot bulbs dont cost twice that of a 2 foot bulb ![]() here are the specs from the fullham site; http://www.fulham.com/Detail_Categor...type=WorkHorse on the right side of that site they have a bulb configuration/wiring diagram assistant. in the first dropdown select T5 Linear HO, in the second one you will see none of their ballast can drive 8xF24HO one last thing (this is getting long, sorry ![]() ![]() cheers vince Last edited by phi delt reefer; 09-22-2010 at 12:56 PM. Reason: inappropriate use of an absolute statement |
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() No unfortunately there is no room for lengthwise running of the bulbs. Trust me that would have been so much easier!
I'm not too hung up on squeezing extra PAR or an extra month of life out of the lamps. All this is for is a little bit of colour bump and a dusk/dawn effect. Ok so the number of lamps is an issue then. Nuts, I was hoping not to buy a new ballast, but if it can't be avoided then it can't be avoided. At least WH's are reasonably inexpensive and running 4 lamps off 4 leads is good and and easy. Thanks for the input..
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() if your just looking for a little color pop have you consider 3w royal blue cree leds? alot of nano reefers use them on their sun pods to give them actinic pop. if this is something you would consider i can get you some pictures. they last 50,000 hours so it would be a one time install.
vince |
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Sure, I'd love to see pictures always!
![]()
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() heres a link to Evil66 Sunpod royal blues that he sold for Sunpods - he was running a 150w halide (14k radium) - which i believe is the same baseline as your system from your earlier comments.
http://www.nano-reef.com/forums/inde...owtopic=194607 heres some pics of the just the LEDs running in a tank http://www.nano-reef.com/forums/lofi...p/t218861.html the pics arent the best but the corals really flouresce (cant spell that word for the life of me!) |
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Honestly, WTF is with that statement? Your implying that an electrician will not know? That Engineer's are somehow Superior in knowledge? What gives you the right to assume that? Just because I may only hold a Red Seal ticket, and not an EE, doesn't mean I would not know. Sorry, but statements like that **** me off to no end. Engineers tick me off too.....
__________________
Dan Pesonen Umm, a tank or 5 |
#18
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
My apologies bandit - I didn't mean to offend anyone with that statement. I have edited it to better communicate what i meant. I felt the question was "generally" better suited for an engineer for we were looking for a technical explanation as to how bulb length/# of bulbs relate to the to the overall stated output of the unit. I figured the question was more of a ballast design/circuitry question than a wiring question. I assume you have read the entire thread so you can see what I was trying to get at. I in no way meant to imply that electricians weren't as knowledgeable - both fields have their specific skills/specializations. Please feel free to weigh in on what I attempted to explain for I am neither an engineer or electrician but a "web researcher/diy'er" |
#19
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() As far as wiring them, I do belive you will not be able to series the bulbs. The balasts won't drive across the 2 gaps, basically. You parralel the tubes up. As long as the tube wattage does not exceed the ballast rating, you should be fine. So, if the ballast was rated for 4 48" bulbs, you can parralel 8 24" in their place.
__________________
Dan Pesonen Umm, a tank or 5 |
#20
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I despise Giesemann T5s. UVL/URI all the way! Try out the "new" 454 bulbs...very similar to the ATI Blue Plus....VERY blue. It actually gives the UVL Super Actinic a run for its money. The 454 is my new favourite bulb right behind the Super Actinic.
|