![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I would say try it but I doubt it will work good, but it could.
hows that for an answer ![]() my concern is the size of the inlett of the dart. at 2" it will suck a lot of water but it all depends on the suction head pressure. if there is enough to supply the dart with lots left over then ya it will work, if not you will get cavatation in one of the pumps. best way to do it would be to have a large bulkhead, say 3" and have it go into a 3" pipe with a "T" on the end to feed the pumps. this will allow more water lower and creat a resivoir which is feed by a large bulkhead under a higher suction head. Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Sounds good, thanks. It seems to me "it could probably work" also means "it could probably not work" and if there's a chance I have to drill out a new bulkhead anyhow, I might as well do it now when the tank is empty rather than down the road. I suppose that leaves more options open anyhow. Worst case scenario I end up not needing the bulkhead (ie., move to an insump skimmer) but then I can just cap it off, or use it for water changes or something.
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Darts can be fed with 1 1/2 bulkheads on closed loops easily because of the head pressure available, drawing from a sump however is slightly different, the higher the sump level and the greater the surface area will help in making this work fine.
I would go for it. |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |