Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-16-2010, 01:11 PM
JonT JonT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 74
JonT is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by intarsiabox View Post
Will likely get cavitation in your pumps but you may be able to throttle the discharge side down enough that it will work. If you get a gravelly sound out of your pump(s) when you turn them on just close the discharge valves off until it goes away and then see if you are still getting enough output for your needs.

This is the most likely result.

Is this a CL? Trying to figure out what your up to, and trying to do? I am sure that this may have been the easiest way, but this hobby is full of DIY'ers, and I am sure we can come up with Plan B-Z for you
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-16-2010, 01:48 PM
amoreira's Avatar
amoreira amoreira is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cowtown
Posts: 109
amoreira is on a distinguished road
Default Probably OK

Cavitation is rarely a concern for small pump a used for aquariums. Also Putting pumps in parallel does not reduce the suction head requirements (NPSHR). So go for it.
__________________
180 gal tank, 50 gal sump, PM RFCa6 Ca Reactor, SWC Extreme 250 1A Cone Skimmer, Tunz Osmolator ATOF, Aquacontroller Apex, Aquaillumination Sol Super Blue 6 x 75w Units, Acros/Softies/LPS/Mushrooms/Zoos, Purple/Powder Blue/Yellow Tang/3xBlue Chromis/2xTomato Clown/Lawnmower Blenny
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-16-2010, 06:40 PM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

One pump is a Reeflo Dart for sump return, the other would be a GenX/Mak4 (assuming it still works, it should, it's just been shelved a few years), which would drive the skimmer (beckett). The GenX should be better able to push against head pressure and wouldn't be throttled; the Dart will likely be throttled but I'm not sure how much will be needed until I fill the tank and see how things settle out.

The Dart has a 2" inlet port and the bulkhead is 2". The GenX on the other hand has a 3/4" inlet port.

My worry is that one pump's suction could be perceived by the other pump much the same as a blockage or throttling on the input side. I know that throttling the outlet side of a pump is copesetic (it's just head pressure); but that throttling the inlet side of a pump is a no-no so was sort of curious if two pumps pulling out the same pipe could produce a similar effect, or if it just creates a wicked suction into said pipe via the bulkhead...

Thanks for the thoughts..
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-16-2010, 10:47 PM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

I would say try it but I doubt it will work good, but it could.

hows that for an answer

my concern is the size of the inlett of the dart. at 2" it will suck a lot of water but it all depends on the suction head pressure. if there is enough to supply the dart with lots left over then ya it will work, if not you will get cavatation in one of the pumps. best way to do it would be to have a large bulkhead, say 3" and have it go into a 3" pipe with a "T" on the end to feed the pumps. this will allow more water lower and creat a resivoir which is feed by a large bulkhead under a higher suction head.

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-16-2010, 11:15 PM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

Sounds good, thanks. It seems to me "it could probably work" also means "it could probably not work" and if there's a chance I have to drill out a new bulkhead anyhow, I might as well do it now when the tank is empty rather than down the road. I suppose that leaves more options open anyhow. Worst case scenario I end up not needing the bulkhead (ie., move to an insump skimmer) but then I can just cap it off, or use it for water changes or something.
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-16-2010, 11:20 PM
golf nut golf nut is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: just north of Toronto
Posts: 454
golf nut is on a distinguished road
Default

Darts can be fed with 1 1/2 bulkheads on closed loops easily because of the head pressure available, drawing from a sump however is slightly different, the higher the sump level and the greater the surface area will help in making this work fine.

I would go for it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-17-2010, 02:12 PM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by golf nut View Post
Darts can be fed with 1 1/2 bulkheads on closed loops easily because of the head pressure available, drawing from a sump however is slightly different, the higher the sump level and the greater the surface area will help in making this work fine.

I would go for it.
the surface area really has nothing to do with the pressure of the water at the suction, it is all hight. that is my concern as most sumps are not that tall and we don't run them full so the suction head is going to be small. now if he had a 24" tall sump and ran it at 23" I would say most likely it would work, but that is unlikely.

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-17-2010, 02:09 PM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delphinus View Post
I might as well do it now when the tank is empty rather than down the road. I suppose that leaves more options open anyhow. Worst case scenario I end up not needing the bulkhead (ie., move to an insump skimmer) but then I can just cap it off, or use it for water changes or something.
thats what I would do. makes for a nicer install also as you can have the pumps in different areas with out them being tied togeather.

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.