![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
This is the most likely result. Is this a CL? Trying to figure out what your up to, and trying to do? I am sure that this may have been the easiest way, but this hobby is full of DIY'ers, and I am sure we can come up with Plan B-Z for you ![]() |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Cavitation is rarely a concern for small pump a used for aquariums. Also Putting pumps in parallel does not reduce the suction head requirements (NPSHR). So go for it.
__________________
180 gal tank, 50 gal sump, PM RFCa6 Ca Reactor, SWC Extreme 250 1A Cone Skimmer, Tunz Osmolator ATOF, Aquacontroller Apex, Aquaillumination Sol Super Blue 6 x 75w Units, Acros/Softies/LPS/Mushrooms/Zoos, Purple/Powder Blue/Yellow Tang/3xBlue Chromis/2xTomato Clown/Lawnmower Blenny |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() One pump is a Reeflo Dart for sump return, the other would be a GenX/Mak4 (assuming it still works, it should, it's just been shelved a few years), which would drive the skimmer (beckett). The GenX should be better able to push against head pressure and wouldn't be throttled; the Dart will likely be throttled but I'm not sure how much will be needed until I fill the tank and see how things settle out.
The Dart has a 2" inlet port and the bulkhead is 2". The GenX on the other hand has a 3/4" inlet port. My worry is that one pump's suction could be perceived by the other pump much the same as a blockage or throttling on the input side. I know that throttling the outlet side of a pump is copesetic (it's just head pressure); but that throttling the inlet side of a pump is a no-no ![]() Thanks for the thoughts..
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I would say try it but I doubt it will work good, but it could.
hows that for an answer ![]() my concern is the size of the inlett of the dart. at 2" it will suck a lot of water but it all depends on the suction head pressure. if there is enough to supply the dart with lots left over then ya it will work, if not you will get cavatation in one of the pumps. best way to do it would be to have a large bulkhead, say 3" and have it go into a 3" pipe with a "T" on the end to feed the pumps. this will allow more water lower and creat a resivoir which is feed by a large bulkhead under a higher suction head. Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Sounds good, thanks. It seems to me "it could probably work" also means "it could probably not work" and if there's a chance I have to drill out a new bulkhead anyhow, I might as well do it now when the tank is empty rather than down the road. I suppose that leaves more options open anyhow. Worst case scenario I end up not needing the bulkhead (ie., move to an insump skimmer) but then I can just cap it off, or use it for water changes or something.
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Darts can be fed with 1 1/2 bulkheads on closed loops easily because of the head pressure available, drawing from a sump however is slightly different, the higher the sump level and the greater the surface area will help in making this work fine.
I would go for it. |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |