LF: Bubble Magus NAC7 Cone Skimmer (new or used)

[Ron99]

Originally Posted by snow1

thanks but I don't want that skimmer. Pm me the details of getting one sir. I can wait a week.

Just curious as to why you prefer the NAC7 over the SWC? Nothing against the BM as I currently run an NAC6 but the SWC has a significantly better pump which will make a huge difference in performance. It would be the one I would choose out of those two.

[OceanicCorals-Ian-]

Originally Posted by Ron99

Just curious as to why you prefer the NAC7 over the SWC? Nothing against the BM as I currently run an NAC6 but the SWC has a significantly better pump which will make a huge difference in performance. It would be the one I would choose out of those two.

+1!!

This would also be a good choice for the cone version, this Skimmer is a Monster, many customers that have bought this I am sure could attest to it's performance.

http://www.oceaniccorals.com/store/i...&productId=593

[snow1]

Well do you have that skimmer in stock right now? The SWC one?

[OceanicCorals-Ian-]

Originally Posted by snow1

Well do you have that skimmer in stock right now? The SWC one?

I have neither in stock at the moment but I can have any of them by first thing next week. I would go for the SWC 160 Xtreme Cone if you can... You will be very impressed.

[snow1]

hmmmm let me think about it. I'm going to have a fairly stocked 175g tank. What size is the SWC skimmer go up to? (Gallons wise?)

[snow1]

Here I got this from the WWW
doesn't look so great to me...seems small.

Xtreme 160 cone SkimmerLight Bioload(150g) Medium Bioload(120g) Heavy Bioload Tank(90g) ratings.

[OceanicCorals-Ian-]

Originally Posted by snow1

hmmmm let me think about it. I'm going to have a fairly stocked 175g tank. What size is the SWC skimmer go up to? (Gallons wise?)

Well neither the NCA7 or the Extreme 160 Cone are rated for 175 Gallons; however, the 160 will still outperform the NCA7.

If you were to buy a Skimmer that is factory rated for a well stocked 175 Gallon you would want to choose the SWC Mini S Skimmer, it is rated for 180 Gallons at heavy Bio load.

http://www.oceaniccorals.com/store/i...&productId=594

Review of the Mini S Cone.

http://www.3reef.com/forums/protein-...iew-84248.html

[snow1]

That skimmer's footprint is to large. I can't have something larger than 10"x10"...(LxW) wise. Is there any skimmer you can suggest that is good up to 175g but with that small of a foot print? Don't say tunze skimmers b/c I've read some not great reviews on them.