![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
To use the skimmer example, you would need to describe your system in detail -system volume, reef/FOWLER, SPS or LPS dominated, fish type and quantity (today and where you expect to go with it in the future) etc. etc. The person replying should have used a particular skimmer on a similar system and should point out any differences that may be a factor. This rarely happens though so what you get is what was a good skimmer for THEM but may be less than ideal for you -because you have different needs. This is, in part, why books usually steer clear of that kind of information and stick with conceptual information, like how a skimmer works and the different types. Take anything you read here (or on any forum) with a grain of (sea) salt. No one will intentionally steer you wrong but the information you get may not be best for you an your setup. Of course, you should never blindly follow what anyone suggests either -look for a consensus from a number of people before you act.
__________________
-Mark 29 Gal Bowfront w/24" LED Lights. DIY HOB Sump (5.4 Gal) MP40. Orange Spotted Watchman Goby, 2 Clownfish and a few hermits. |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Everyones tank is so different! When I bought my Red Sea Prism Skimmer it saies right on the box the gallon rating for what you have in your tank. Minimal fish up to 100gallons to a max bio load with fish and corals to like 20gallons (just off the top of my head). Just goes to show that the skimmer has to be purposed specifically to each tank and its inhabitants. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() My favorite online source would be Reef Keeping Magazine online.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() ^ Agreed.
![]() |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Well if you have approximately 78 weeks, you may be able to read all the archived articles they have on there. Tonnes, and tonnes of really good information. I look towards hard published materials for information more than the internet. If it is hard published (like a magazine or book) then people tend to be more discriminatory on what they write and suggest sticking to proven methods, and discussing new methods with an open mind, but also a good warning.
![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Of particular interest to me was the series of articles they did on comparative skimmer performance. Air stone, anyone???
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|