![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Dan Pesonen Umm, a tank or 5 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
+1, it would be very difficult to overdose the pellets! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Hey Guys , i e-mailed my questions to the web site stated on the package and here is his response.
One of the points he makes is that you can Not overdose, however i talked to one of the trusted long term J&L personnel and he told me that when he doubled the pellets he had a bacteria bloom in hie tank. Anywho below is the response to my questions. Morning ! The exact amount is hard to tell because of the bioload of the tank. You can not overdose the product. The guide line is 50-200ml of pellets per 100L of water The more water thrugh the pellets, the better. It is best to use the BioPellets in a fluidized bed filter, so yes it is best that they thumble. They can also being used in a canister filter, but keep the flow through in mind. The production of mulm is not necessory. It is a benefit if it happens because it will serve as food for small animals. If the pellets are in a fluidized bed filter, then no need to shake the pellet. If they are in a canister filter, I would say yes. Best Regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Dennis van Houten D. van Houten (Import-Export-Euro*Depot/Distribution) Postbus 5081 9700 GB Groningen, The Netherlands Tel: +31 (0)6 51717084 Fax: +31 (0)50 5777204 ----- Original Message ----- To: info@dvh-import.com Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:37 AM Subject: BioPellets Good morning. Can you please elaborate on the exact use of the pellets in terms of the following The exact ammount of pellets per 100 liters The exact amount of flow thrugh the pellets Shuld the pellets thumble or be at rest Is the production of mulm necessory or not, some people report a lot of white mulm some none at all Should pellets be shaken regulary or left alone |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Thanks for sharing that. Just as I thought, the more flow throughput the better the pellets will perform. At a high flow rate the mulm is not going to be visable as the fast moving water will carry away any particals shedding from the pellets.
So how many gph is everyone running through their reactor? |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]() What I want to know is, what ever happened to the notion of having too much flow through a media reactor? I thought that too much flow would not allow for enough contact time for the bacteria to consume the passing nutrients? Last edited by kien; 02-11-2010 at 04:24 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
My point exactly, with fast flow how can bacteria have time to consume anything? Unless the idea behind this (like was mentioned by Ian) is not to get anaerobic, and bacteria will consume what ever is attached to the individual pellet. I have to report though that bubble algae is disappearing slowly, i used to have quite a bit of it and now almost nothing (!). But there was one change, i started using Coral Snow and Zeo bak, so i don't know yet if i am convinced, but hey this is fun ! |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ordered mine last night due to this thread. also placed an order with another company for some new digital aquatics gear seeing as ive run out of space on my power bar's. I also has a plan for sponge replacement on reactor that might work out well.
__________________
Two clownfish were in a tank. One says to the other, how do i drive this thing? |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Dan Pesonen Umm, a tank or 5 |
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I tried using enkamat and found the pellets still get through quite easily. I then used quilting mesh and its working very well in keeping the pellets in the phosban reactor while allowing the mj1200 to flow at max.
__________________
____________ If people don't die, it wouldn't make living important. And why do we fall? So we can learn to pick ourselves up. |
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Is that a typo? 900ghp? That seems like alot for a little TLF reator, much more than what I was planning. I was gearing towards 500gph or so. Guess I have to rethink my reactor again.
|