![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Pffft Ryan Miller with 26 Wins, 5 SO and a SVPCT of 0.936 is where its at
![]() |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() If you don't think shots on goal is a worthy stat, your out to lunch - anyhow, if you seen Kipper this year , you would come to understand, or maybe not, judging by some of the comments, that Kipper is the Flames MVP game in game out -
Don't even talk to me about what level of Hockey I played and with who, I can see now by your coments you really don't know hockey at all |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Its not that is itsn't a good stat, it showes that the goalie had to be in the net that many times or the puck would have went in. what I am saying is overall it is a weak stat, and there are breakdowns of it that are much better. look at it this way. if a team is on the penility kill for 40 min of the game and all they do is ice the puck 50 times right at the other teams net from there end, that counts as 50 shots on net.. did the goalie have to work that hard? here is a good article on goaltending statistice and why they are no good. it is old, but the theory and statistics are still good, even mention Cow Towns goaltending in 2003 I think. http://www.hockeyanalytics.com/Resea...ot_Quality.pdf here is a quote from his 2005 data " Calgary: It is widely held that Miikka Kiprusoff carried the Flames on his back. However, the Flames saw easier shots than the rest of the league, except when Dany Sabourin played goal (which was only 4 games). However, Kiprusoff exceeded predictions (.933 save percentage vs. .912 predicted) by a significant margin, thus earning the accolades." here is 2006 data " Calgary: The Flames, with a defensive style reputation, “prevented” tougher shots against (.903 shot quality). When Vezina winner Miikka Kiprusoff played, the Flames saw a shot quality of .904 and their goalie well outplayed predictions (actual save percentage of .923; 102.10 SQI). When Brian Boucher (acquired late in the year) played, the shot quality was tougher than average (.888) and he failed to stop shots at his predicted rate (96.17 SQI). Philip Sauve (dealt to Phoenix) saw average shot quality and came in below predictions. The Flames tied the Wild for the “easiest” median predicted probability of saving a shot at .940. That is, a full half of their shots against were predicted to be stopped at the .940 rate or higher, which speaks highly of Calgary’s defense." anyways Both Luongo and Brodure face easyer shots on a consistant basis also, which also goes to the team building process of getting a good defencive core first. with a good defence you can spen less on a goalie and end up with good results. this was Detroits way of doing businness for years. Calgary kinda did this but they also spent money on a goalie to steal the odd game the defence couldent win. there is another study out there that goes further and breaks down the shot to where on the ice it was taken, by both distance and angle. I will see if I can find it and post it also it is an eye opener. Due to my advancing age, I am not as quick as I used to be so I have turned into more of a statistical goal player using my size and angles to my advantage.. but I can definatly tell you that a good defencive pair makes a heck of a differance on the types of shots I face. on our 3 lines one is not very good but they try ![]() ![]() Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]() Why not start to run your mouth with a nice list of the NHL players you played with and then explain the injury that stopped you from getting to the NHL which will of course make you better at life than all of us. Oh wait your name is Wayner....are...are you Wayne Gretzky?! Just because you disagree about my comments doesn't mean you have to get your panties in a bunch. They were not personal. Please explain though. Shots are generally a useless stat because as said earlier, the stat does not break down where on the ice they were taken from. But then again, I don't know anything about hockey. NFL football is my game anyways. I was just a pretty decent hockey player and too small to play football...but I know, you were a better player and because of that know much more than anyone else. Kind of like how Wayne Gretzky was the best player ever and that made him the best coach ever and....oh wait... ![]() |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I didn't have a chance to watch the flames sharks game last night. What was the final score?
__________________
60" 120G project-DONE!!!! |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Kipper was the MVP of the game. |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I'm not *really* a fan I just like to fan these flames here =)
I was totally hoping for 'ten' last night too...if you're gonna get blown out...do it RIGHT haha. |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I think kipper has improved this year from last,and Louie has been good since coming back from injury less than 2 goals against,but really Broduer is still the better of the three by far.I'm glad he will be the goalie for canada because he's proven himself when the pressure is on.
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Last nights game just proves the point that when Kipper has a bad game., the Flames are a really bad team., I'd trade Iginila and his 7 million dollar salary and pick up a few really good players., better still, package him off with Phaneuf.
Shots on goal didn't play a factor in lasts night game, ya right, GreenspottedPuffer probably thought only a couple of shots were quality shots. Ya right. |
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Steve
__________________
![]() Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |