![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Density of water may affect bubble size or frequency? any reason to not use FW?
__________________
Brad |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() I think Brads right on this one, I don't run a calcium reactor but If I'm correct you are dissolving gaseous CO2 to create H2CO3 which in turn dissolves your media. If your bubbling through saltwater any additional ions could interfere with this process. (I am by no means an expert on reactors though so If someone can clarify that would be nice) Levi Last edited by Zoaelite; 12-03-2009 at 11:32 PM. |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() From a practical standpoint, I can't see where using FW or SW would make an appreciable difference. Bubble counting isn't exactly a science
![]()
__________________
Brad |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I always used saltwater, filling mine was a total PITA.
__________________
Christy's Reef Blog My 180 Build Every electronic component is shipped with smoke stored deep inside.... only a real genius can find a way to set it free. |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() My new calcium reactor automatically fills the bubblecounter with salt water, a great feature that I wish my old one had
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() You can also use glycerin, (called bubble counter fluid) it doesn't evaporate as fast in bubble counters that don't fill themselves.
__________________
Brian ____________________________________________ 220g inwall 48"x36"x30" 110g mangrove refug/sump Poison Dart Frog Vivarium |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Filling it with fresh water is a PITA. Only reason I asked. Didn't want to bother unless some had a real good reason to fill it with FW.
Sounds like others use SW so SW it is. Thanks everyone. |