![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I think the 52-528g is referring to Tunze's whole line of skimmers. Looks like the 9005 is rated for up to 100g. I don't have any experience with Tunze skimmers but generally speaking bigger is better.
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Thanks for pointing that out I didn't catch that it was on the specs for the 9005 but it makes sense that one skimmer wouldn't have that wide of an application.
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() +1 bigger is better
The 9002 is kind of small... I don't think it'll be a good long term choice for your tank. I bought one for my 15 gallon + 10 gallon sump. Right now I'd hesitate to put it on a larger system... but to be honest, the system isn't up and running yet, so I might eat my words ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() That's a 1" bulkhead for size reference. How about a 9010? There's one FS right now... http://canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=56383 |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() A good guideline is get one that is rated to 2x the total gallons of your system
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Yes, remember that what a skimmer is rated for is the MAX. A lot of people get a 180 gallon tank, and think a skimmer that is good for 180 gallons is a perfect choice. That doesn't make any sense at all. I like to stay about 30% from the rating. So for your tank which total volume will probably be about 70 gallons (assuming the sump half full), you would do well with a skimmr rated for 100 or so gallons. I think you may be happier with an EuroReef RS-100 or a Vertex IN-100 instead of the Tunze 9005 though. I'm not a fan of the Tunze skimmers (other than the Nano does a good job on small tanks).
Last edited by Myka; 09-30-2009 at 01:07 AM. |