Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-17-2009, 02:55 PM
Snaz's Avatar
Snaz Snaz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 1,034
Snaz is on a distinguished road
Default

I would agree that corals are more pigmented where the "sunlight" hits them but a glass interface reduces the amount of light through.

Imagine looking at penny top down through one foot of water. Then imagine looking at the same penny through one foot of glass. The penny under the glass would look dull compared to the water penny.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-17-2009, 03:36 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaz View Post
I would agree that corals are more pigmented where the "sunlight" hits them but a glass interface reduces the amount of light through.

Imagine looking at penny top down through one foot of water. Then imagine looking at the same penny through one foot of glass. The penny under the glass would look dull compared to the water penny.
Interesting logic but I'm not sure who's tank was 12" thick glass or who even has a piece of glass like that lying around to try such an experiment Glass actually has a refraction index close to water it's about 1.4 compared to 1.3, so given that tanks are generally built with thin glass when compared to the amount of water you're looking through the effects are not that relative. Try looking through glass from top down, which is often done for photography, you won't see a real noticeable difference.

The fact is, like already said, everything looks brighter and more vivid because you're looking parallel to the light source. Our vision is based on how light reflects back to our eyes and parts in direct light look brighter while other parts not in direct light are more shaded and dull. Look around outside as some stationary objects when the sun is low in the morning and when it is high in the afternoon.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-17-2009, 03:55 PM
Snaz's Avatar
Snaz Snaz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 1,034
Snaz is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
Glass actually has a refraction index close to water it's about 1.4 compared to 1.3...
So if water has a comparable refractive index as glass then surely then refraction is not the issue here correct? My logic is that the glass just does not allow some of the light through.

Again lets look at the 3/8" glass cover on the face of a metal halide light, it blocks up to 80%? of the UV rays does it not? This to me illustrates clearly that glass has great potential to block light.
__________________

Last edited by Snaz; 09-17-2009 at 04:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-17-2009, 04:15 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaz View Post
So if water has a comparable refractive index as glass then surely the refraction is not the issue here correct? My logic is that the glass just does not allow some of the light through.

Again lets look at the 3/8" glass cover on the face of a metal halide light, it blocks up to 80%? of the UV rays does it not? This to me illustrates clearly that glass has great potential to block light.
Glass can filter UV but this would also be irrelevant since UV is not visible to us and therefore doesn't greatly effect how we see things. Glass will block/absorb light, but so does water which is why light intensity is less with more water depth. You should also note that the glass used in MH fixtures has a coating or specific formula to lower the emissivity which results in the high reflection of UV light, this is not typical with standard glass.

The point is the glass has little to no effect on the topic here. If you could remove the glass from your aquarium you would still see the same effect comparing top to side views (other than a little less green tint from the sides). Acrylic has no tint and the index of refraction is even closer to water and yet these tanks still suffer from side perspective. For this reason I don't see glass as part of the equation, if a variable can be removed without effecting the outcome then it is not part of the problem.

Last edited by sphelps; 09-17-2009 at 05:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-18-2009, 01:04 PM
fishytime's Avatar
fishytime fishytime is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: E-town
Posts: 5,390
fishytime will become famous soon enough
Default

So, why then do clams also look different through the glass then they do top down?.....I have one crocea that looks purple through the glass but is green top down.
__________________
260g mixed reef, 105g sump, water blaster 7000 return, Bubble King SM 300 skimmer, Aqua Controller Jr, 4 radions, 3 Tunze 6055s,1 tunze 6065, 2 Vortech MP40s, Vortech MP20, Tunze ATO, GHL SA2 doser, 2 TLF reactors (1 carbon, 1 rowa). http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=50034 . Tank Video here http://www.vimeo.com/2304609 and here http://www.vimeo.com/16591694
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-18-2009, 01:41 PM
o.c.d.'s Avatar
o.c.d. o.c.d. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calgary Alb.
Posts: 225
o.c.d. is on a distinguished road
Default

Iridophores have groups of cells that contain reflective platelets which act as light intensifiers. Depending on the orientation of the platelets, relative to incoming light, They can defect the light away or towards the clams eyes. That is also how the clam can react to a shadow of a hand passing over,or the difference of appearance form viewing at different angles.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-18-2009, 02:37 AM
Myka's Avatar
Myka Myka is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Saskatoon, SK.
Posts: 11,268
Myka will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaz View Post
Again lets look at the 3/8" glass cover on the face of a metal halide light, it blocks up to 80%? of the UV rays does it not? This to me illustrates clearly that glass has great potential to block light.
Take a look at Sanjay's lighting pages. Several of the DE bulbs give PPFD numbers with glass, and without glass. There is very little difference. The glass does not block very much of the light.
__________________
~ Mindy

SPS fanatic.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.