![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I wonder though about the ratings forums, and whether or not they should be reviewed annually. I think some of the positive ratings in this case were early on. I doubt there would be many positive ratings at this stage.
__________________
http://www.canreef.com/ftotm/sept05/index.php |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Deb, you're probably right, but we aren't sure how to review. If we reset the polls, we lose all info, which has some historical benefit. We'll give it some thought though..
__________________
Brad |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Vendor rating have to be accumulative over time. Yes a vendor can go down hill fast or suddenly improve. Over all performance is the only true rating for a vendor. If we where to delete the reviews and start fresh than it would be possible for a review from a person with unrealistic expectations to scew the entire rateings. the more people that rate a vendor the more accurate the rating will be
J Last edited by Jason McK; 08-20-2009 at 06:09 AM. |