Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-24-2009, 01:47 PM
Myka's Avatar
Myka Myka is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Saskatoon, SK.
Posts: 11,268
Myka will become famous soon enough
Default

The calcium and alkalinity need to be in a proper ratio to each other, and balance is more important than the actual number they are at...within reason. Check the link in my signature for an easy read on the relationship between the different key elements.

Balanced calcium and alkalinity:

350 ppm to 1.4 dKH
375 ppm to 2.1 dKH
400 ppm to 5.6 dKH
425 ppm to 9.1 dKH
450 ppm to 12.6 dKH
475 ppm to 16.1 dKH
__________________
~ Mindy

SPS fanatic.


Last edited by Myka; 07-24-2009 at 01:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-24-2009, 02:04 PM
Ephraim's Avatar
Ephraim Ephraim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 307
Ephraim is on a distinguished road
Default

every tank is different when i comes to optimal alk. It took some time to find my tank's sweet spot, 11-12dkh.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-24-2009, 02:51 PM
Dez's Avatar
Dez Dez is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,793
Dez is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Myka View Post
The calcium and alkalinity need to be in a proper ratio to each other, and balance is more important than the actual number they are at...within reason. Check the link in my signature for an easy read on the relationship between the different key elements.

Balanced calcium and alkalinity:

350 ppm to 1.4 dKH
375 ppm to 2.1 dKH
400 ppm to 5.6 dKH
425 ppm to 9.1 dKH
450 ppm to 12.6 dKH
475 ppm to 16.1 dKH
You just made my day Mindy. My calcium is about 460 ppm with the almost about 16 - 17 dKH ..... I though my parameters were way off with the high dKH. Thanks so much
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-24-2009, 03:28 PM
banditpowdercoat's Avatar
banditpowdercoat banditpowdercoat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 100 mile hse BC
Posts: 2,568
banditpowdercoat is on a distinguished road
Default

Ya Mindy, that looks like I am right in the zone for my Ca too. Im slowny trying to raise my CA amd Mg to 420 and 1400, which I was told was NSW levels. Just using Chemmasters additives, I only add at water changes dont supplement in between
__________________
Dan Pesonen


Umm, a tank or 5
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-24-2009, 06:07 PM
mark's Avatar
mark mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,212
mark is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by banditpowdercoat View Post
Ya Mindy, that looks like I am right in the zone for my Ca too. Im slowny trying to raise my CA amd Mg to 420 and 1400, which I was told was NSW levels. Just using Chemmasters additives, I only add at water changes dont supplement in between

NSW: Ca 420ppm, alk 7dKH, Mg 1280ppm
__________________
my tank
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-24-2009, 07:01 PM
Drock169's Avatar
Drock169 Drock169 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 346
Drock169 is on a distinguished road
Default

I think it depends on where you get NSW parameters from. I've read 420, 8, 1350
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-24-2009, 07:09 PM
mark's Avatar
mark mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,212
mark is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drock169 View Post
I think it depends on where you get NSW parameters from. I've read 420, 8, 1350
Realize there's variations but I go from the link I put up which in turn references:
Chemical Oceanography, Second Edition. Millero, Frank J.; Editor. USA. (1996), 496 pp. Publisher: (CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.)
__________________
my tank
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-24-2009, 07:33 PM
Oceanic's Avatar
Oceanic Oceanic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Langley
Posts: 289
Oceanic is on a distinguished road
Default

I keep my tank at 7.5 to a maximum of 8 DKH. Zeovit tanks should be kept anywhere between 6.5 - 8 for proper success and less chances of coral stress.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-24-2009, 08:11 PM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mark View Post
Realize there's variations but I go from the link I put up which in turn references:
Chemical Oceanography, Second Edition. Millero, Frank J.; Editor. USA. (1996), 496 pp. Publisher: (CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.)
yup, lots of variations, posting NSW valuses is useless unless you also post the area and depth it was taken from. personaly that is one of the lowest valuse I have ever seen for Mg, and one of the higher Ca readings.

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-24-2009, 11:27 PM
Myka's Avatar
Myka Myka is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Saskatoon, SK.
Posts: 11,268
Myka will become famous soon enough
Default

You guys are very welcome! I go by Randy Holmes-Farley who says NSW calcium is 410 ppm, 7 dKH, and 1280 ppm magnesium.
__________________
~ Mindy

SPS fanatic.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.